Review of the Agriculture of Lower Canada, With Suggestions for Its Amelioration: First Published in a Series of Communications, in the "Montreal Gazette,"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
duty than to endeavour to understand this cause, and s'rive to provide a remedy.It is a public and genetal loss, to have good land occupied, and labor and seed applied in its cultivation, in so defective a maimer, that it doss not yield remunerative retnrns, or such returns as would be quite possible to realise under more skilful and judicious management.With an industrious and intelligent soil generally is trior to any I have seen in North America, and our climate is not unfavorable for the production of a variety of crops in perfection, because I have seen them in the greatest perfect'on With all these facts before us, why should we be second to any country in agriculture?f met a gentleman lately, who has been for ' many years in the provision trade, between North America and the We4 Indies, and he told me that Canadian beef was considered lean and of inferior quality to the beef of the United States, and this 1 am disposed to be- lieve, irom the sort of cattle I have frequently seen slaughtered and packed in Montreal.He also said that flour from some States of the Union was superior to any from Canada, and he attributed this to the flour being dryer and closer packed, and said that the barrels were smaller in size by one-eighth than the Canadian barrels for the same weight of flour, and this he considered preserved the flour better, by excluding the air.I mention these circumstances without pretending to vouch for their correctness as regards flour.If there is any fault in the management of those matters, they should be remedied, and the character of our products maintained in every part of the world they may be sent to.With regard to the character of Canadian flour in the West Indies, I may have been correctly informed.If the wheat is damp, or frozen, and made into flour in this state, with- out kiln drying, it would not keep well sub- quently.It is of great importance that this matter should be enquired into.the farmer is not so much to blame for the bad character of the flour, though the grower of wheat must suffer if the flour will not maintain a good character in foreign markets.Our country is and ought to be a produce country, and it is of the greatest importance to the producer that the character of the produce even after it passes out of the hands of the grower, should be maintained good.Wheat that is stacked out, unless carefully thatched, after the stacks are well made, is very liable to imbibe more or less moisture, and in that csfce the grain cannot be perfectly dry, and may become frozen.If this is a common occurrence, it is very probable the grain may not be perfectly dry when made into flour, and of course the flour cannot, keep so well as if the grain was dry.Is there any excuse for keeping cattle until they are two, three or four years old, and then selling them for beef, when there is no beef
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".