Phase II Dose-Finding Study with TAK-442, An Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor, in Patients Undergoing Elective Knee Arthroplasty.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 170 TAK-442 is an oral, selective, direct competitive inhibitor of activated factor X (fXa). This phase 2, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group study compared a range of TAK-442 doses with enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after elective unilateral total knee arthroplasty. After surgery, males and females 18 years of age or older were randomly assigned to 1 of 7 treatment groups: TAK-442 at doses of 40 or 80 mg p.o. once daily (QD) or 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg p.o. twice daily (BID), or enoxaparin 30 mg s.c. BID (n=150 per group). Enoxaparin was given unblinded, whereas TAK-442 given double-blinded with regard to dose and regimen. The first dose of TAK-442 was administered 6-8 hours postoperatively and after hemostasis was established, while the first dose of enoxaparin was given 12-24 hours after surgery according to North American guidelines; TAK-442 and enoxaparin were given for 10 days and patients were followed for 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Bilateral ascending venography was performed after the last dose of study drug to screen for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT, and pulmonary embolism (PE). The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding, based on a pre-specified bleeding scale. Independent, blinded committees adjudicated all suspected efficacy outcomes and bleeding events. Of the 1038 patients who received study drug and were included in the full analysis set (FAS) and safety population, 949 completed the study; 730 patients had evaluable venograms. Following the recommendation of the Data Safety Monitoring Board, the TAK-442 10 mg and 20 mg BID groups were discontinued prematurely because of lack of efficacy with respect to asymptomatic DVT. The incidences of the primary efficacy endpoint and its components in the population with evaluable endpoints, and of major bleeding in the safety population, are shown in the table.Values are n (%) unless otherwise specified.* P<0.05 vs enoxaparin. Patients in the FAS exhibited a similar trend in efficacy, with incidences of the composite primary endpoint of 28.8%, 25.8%, 16.7%, 14.8%, 18.8%, and 10.6%, respectively, across the TAK-442 doses, and 14.9% for enoxaparin. The minimum effective dose of TAK-442 was determined to be 40 mg QD, while the maximum dose of 80 mg BID tended to be more effective than enoxaparin in this study. The frequency of major and clinically significant non-major (CSNM) bleeding was not dose-dependent or different from that seen with enoxaparin. Similarly, the frequency of liver function test abnormalities was not dose-dependent or different from that seen with enoxaparin. Treatment-emergent AEs leading to study drug discontinuation occurred in 5.5% of the TAK-442 subjects and 7.5% of the enoxaparin subjects. In addition, the overall incidence of AEs or SAEs in the TAK-442 treatment groups was not dose-dependent or greatly different from that seen with enoxaparin 30 mg BID. These data suggest that, at total daily doses of 40 to 160 mg, the efficacy of TAK-442 is similar to that of enoxaparin 30 mg BID in patients undergoing total knee replacement. The low incidence of major and CSNM bleeding suggests that TAK-442 has a favorable benefit to risk profile in this population. Disclosures: Weitz: Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy; Takeda Global Research & Development, Inc.: Consultancy; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy; The Medicines Company: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Cao:Takeda Global Research & Development, Inc.: Employment. Eriksson:Takeda Global Research & Development, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Fisher:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda Global Research & Development, Inc.: Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; sanofi-aventis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boeringer-Ingelhiem: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kupfer:Takeda Global Research & Development, Inc.: Employment. Raskob:Takeda Global Research & Development, Inc.: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Boehringer –Ingelheim: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy. Spaeder:Takeda Global Research & Development, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turpie:Takeda Global Research & Development, Inc.: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».