MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2561214156 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.4437.4437

A Canadian Expanded Access Trial of Oral Nilotinb in Adult Patients with Imatinib-Resistant or -Intolerant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Blast Crisis, Accelerated Phase or Chronic Phase

2011· article· en· W2561214156 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Robert Delage, A. Robert Turner, Brian Leber, Wanda Hasegawa, Denis‐Claude Roy, Mary Lynn Savoie, Heather A. Leitch, Isabelle Bence‐Bruckler, Donna L. Forrest, Sindu Kanjeekal, Sehdev Sandeep, Pierre Laneuville, Sarit Assouline, Kuljit Grewal, Michael J. Kovacs, Wwt Lam, Annie Woo, Pierre Beauparlant, Jeffrey H. Lipton

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreNovartis (Canada)St. John’s Health Sciences CentreJewish General HospitalMcMaster University Medical CentreCapital District Health AuthorityHealth Sciences CentreWindsor Regional HospitalOttawa HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreBrampton Civic HospitalSt. Paul's HospitalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of OttawaVictoria HospitalHôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNilotinibMedicineDiscontinuationInternal medicineAdverse effectImatinibRashImatinib mesylateMyeloid leukemiaPhases of clinical researchCytopeniaSurgeryGastroenterologyClinical trialBone marrow

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 4437 This multi-center, open-label, single-arm study evaluated the safety and efficacy of nilotinib in patients with imatinib resistant/intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in blast crisis, accelerated phase and chronic phase. This study provided expanded access to nilotinib prior to commercial availability. Methods: Patients received nilotinib orally at a dose of 400 mg twice daily. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study and assessments of cardiac, hematology and blood chemistry were performed every 3 months at a minimum. The efficacy assessments were performed every 6 months at a minimum and comprised of cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow, evaluation of extramedullary disease, and cancer related symptoms. Results: Sixty-five patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 56 (range 21–85) years; 50.8% were male, and 89.2% Caucasian. The majority of patients (92.3%) were in chronic phase; 3.1% and 4.6% of the patients were in blast crisis and accelerated phase respectively. Twenty-five (38.5%) patients were imatinib-resistant, thirty-seven (56.9%) imatinib-intolerant and three (4.6%) both imatinib-resistant and -intolerant. The overall median duration of treatment with nilotinib was 27.2 (range 0.3 – 48.8) months. Thirty-six patients (55.4%) were still on treatment at study end. The main reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (16.9%) and unsatisfactory therapeutic effect (12.3%). Treatment related adverse events reported in at least 10% of patients, irrespective of severity, included rash (23.1%), pruritus (20%), fatigue (18.5%), muscle spasms (15.4%), headache (16.9%), alopecia (13.8%), abdominal pain (10.8%) and lipase elevation (10.8%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events reported in at least 5% of patients, irrespective of study drug relationship, included thrombocytopenia (12.3 %), anemia (6.2%), neutropenia (6.2%) and lipase elevation (6.2%). Three patients (4.6%) discontinued due to cardiac disorders including tachycardia (1), myocardial infarction (1), and palpitations (1). Clinically significant abnormal ECG results were uncommon and mostly transient. There was no evidence of toxicity to a major organ system. One patient died within 28 days after study discontinuation due to progression of recently diagnosed multiple myeloma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease deterioration not suspected to be related to study drug. Thirty patients received treatment for at least 30 months with nilotinib on study. At month 30, 14 (82.4%) of 17 patients who underwent a bone marrow aspirate achieved a complete cytogenetic response. Seven of these fourteen patients (50%) had never previously achieved complete cytogenetic response with imatinib. Conclusions: This phase IIIB trial provided nilotinib to 65 patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic CML in all phases on expanded access for 44 months, allowing evaluation of its safety profile. Nilotinib treatment was reasonably well-tolerated with an overall safety profile similar to that reported in previous studies, without the occurrence of unexpected adverse events. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR of BCR-ABL mRNA levels was not a study endpoint but is used routinely in Canada to monitor patients in complete cytogenetic response instead of cytogenetic assessments which likely explains the low compliance with cytogenetic assessments in this study. Disclosures: Turner: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Leber:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hasegawa:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leitch:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bence-Bruckler:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sandeep:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Laneuville:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Woo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.: Employment. Beauparlant:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc: Employment. Lipton:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,896
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,207

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,316
Écart entre enseignants0,275 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207