MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Canadian Expanded Access Trial of Oral Nilotinb in Adult Patients with Imatinib-Resistant or -Intolerant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Blast Crisis, Accelerated Phase or Chronic Phase

2011· article· en· W2561214156 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert Delage, A. Robert Turner, Brian Leber, Wanda Hasegawa, Denis‐Claude Roy, Mary Lynn Savoie, Heather A. Leitch, Isabelle Bence‐Bruckler, Donna L. Forrest, Sindu Kanjeekal, Sehdev Sandeep, Pierre Laneuville, Sarit Assouline, Kuljit Grewal, Michael J. Kovacs, Wwt Lam, Annie Woo, Pierre Beauparlant, Jeffrey H. Lipton

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreNovartis (Canada)St. John’s Health Sciences CentreJewish General HospitalMcMaster University Medical CentreCapital District Health AuthorityHealth Sciences CentreWindsor Regional HospitalOttawa HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreBrampton Civic HospitalSt. Paul's HospitalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of OttawaVictoria HospitalHôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNilotinibMedicineDiscontinuationInternal medicineAdverse effectImatinibRashImatinib mesylateMyeloid leukemiaPhases of clinical researchCytopeniaSurgeryGastroenterologyClinical trialBone marrow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 4437 This multi-center, open-label, single-arm study evaluated the safety and efficacy of nilotinib in patients with imatinib resistant/intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in blast crisis, accelerated phase and chronic phase. This study provided expanded access to nilotinib prior to commercial availability. Methods: Patients received nilotinib orally at a dose of 400 mg twice daily. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study and assessments of cardiac, hematology and blood chemistry were performed every 3 months at a minimum. The efficacy assessments were performed every 6 months at a minimum and comprised of cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow, evaluation of extramedullary disease, and cancer related symptoms. Results: Sixty-five patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 56 (range 21–85) years; 50.8% were male, and 89.2% Caucasian. The majority of patients (92.3%) were in chronic phase; 3.1% and 4.6% of the patients were in blast crisis and accelerated phase respectively. Twenty-five (38.5%) patients were imatinib-resistant, thirty-seven (56.9%) imatinib-intolerant and three (4.6%) both imatinib-resistant and -intolerant. The overall median duration of treatment with nilotinib was 27.2 (range 0.3 – 48.8) months. Thirty-six patients (55.4%) were still on treatment at study end. The main reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (16.9%) and unsatisfactory therapeutic effect (12.3%). Treatment related adverse events reported in at least 10% of patients, irrespective of severity, included rash (23.1%), pruritus (20%), fatigue (18.5%), muscle spasms (15.4%), headache (16.9%), alopecia (13.8%), abdominal pain (10.8%) and lipase elevation (10.8%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events reported in at least 5% of patients, irrespective of study drug relationship, included thrombocytopenia (12.3 %), anemia (6.2%), neutropenia (6.2%) and lipase elevation (6.2%). Three patients (4.6%) discontinued due to cardiac disorders including tachycardia (1), myocardial infarction (1), and palpitations (1). Clinically significant abnormal ECG results were uncommon and mostly transient. There was no evidence of toxicity to a major organ system. One patient died within 28 days after study discontinuation due to progression of recently diagnosed multiple myeloma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease deterioration not suspected to be related to study drug. Thirty patients received treatment for at least 30 months with nilotinib on study. At month 30, 14 (82.4%) of 17 patients who underwent a bone marrow aspirate achieved a complete cytogenetic response. Seven of these fourteen patients (50%) had never previously achieved complete cytogenetic response with imatinib. Conclusions: This phase IIIB trial provided nilotinib to 65 patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic CML in all phases on expanded access for 44 months, allowing evaluation of its safety profile. Nilotinib treatment was reasonably well-tolerated with an overall safety profile similar to that reported in previous studies, without the occurrence of unexpected adverse events. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR of BCR-ABL mRNA levels was not a study endpoint but is used routinely in Canada to monitor patients in complete cytogenetic response instead of cytogenetic assessments which likely explains the low compliance with cytogenetic assessments in this study. Disclosures: Turner: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Leber:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hasegawa:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leitch:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bence-Bruckler:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sandeep:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Laneuville:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Woo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.: Employment. Beauparlant:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc: Employment. Lipton:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207