Anti-CD3 Therapy Expands the CD4+CD25+ Compartment in Hemophilia a Mice Inducing Tregs That Potently Prevent Factor VIII Inhibitor Formation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Non-Fc-Receptor binding anti-CD3 Ab therapy, in the setting of several different autoimmune disorders, can induce antigen-specific and long-lasting immunological tolerance. As FVIII inhibitor formation is the most serious treatmentrelated complication for hemophilia A patients, we tested the efficacy of anti-CD3 to prevent FVIII inhibitor formation in hemophilia A Balb/c and C57Bl/6 mice. Mice were treated intravenously with 50 μg anti-CD3 daily for 5 consecutive days. One, 8 and 15 days after the final anti-CD3 treatment spleens were harvested (n=5/time point) and total splenocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry. One day after anti-CD3 treatment the effector CD4+ and CD8+ populations decreased by >2- fold (p<0.00009), while CD4+CD25+ Treg cells increased 2.2-fold (p=0.0002) compared to untreated control mice. This was maintained at 8 days post anti-CD3 treatment, and by day 15, all T cell populations returned to pre-treatment levels. Interestingly, we observed that smaller doses of anti-CD3 were the most effective at preventing FVIII inhibitor formation. In four separate experiments this optimized dose of anti-CD3 (10 μg/d for 5 d), was administered to Balb/c hemophilia A mice, and 3 days later these mice were immunized with 0.2 μg FVIII (50 U/kg) weekly for 4 weeks. By 1 week after the final FVIII immunization, 98% of the HBSS-treated control (n = 30) and 22% of anti-CD3-treated mice (n = 33) were inhibitor positive. Twenty-seven of 33 anti-CD3-treated mice were inhibitor negative (p = 0.000065). Importantly, the mean inhibitor titer in the anti-CD3-treated mice was 1.6 ± 1.1 BU/mL compared to the HBSS-treated mice at 50.1 ± 14.9 BU/mL (p = 0.0014). We depleted CD4+CD25+ T cells in vivo to test their importance in the FVIII tolerogenic process. Hemophilia A Balb/c mice were injected intraperitoneally with anti-CD25 (clone PC61) or isotype control (Rat IgG1) on days 0 and 5. Next, mice received 10 μg/d anti- CD3 on days 3–7 and on day 10, the first of 4 weekly FVIII immunizations was begun. One week after the 4th FVIII immunization, plasma was assessed for inhibitor formation by the Bethesda assay. Tolerance to FVIII was completely ablated in the anti-CD25/anti-CD3- treated mice (mean titer 110 ± 36 BU/mL), while the isotype control/anti-CD3-treated mice continued to show markedly reduced inhibitor levels (1.2 ± 1.9 BU/mL, p = 0.00003). To directly test the tolerogenic capacity of CD4+CD25+ population from tolerant animals, this population was cocultured, in the presence of FVIII, with splenocytes from FVIII immunized mice that were not treated with anti-CD3. Cells were either in direct contact or were physically separated by a transwell membrane. We observed a contact-dependent 30% and 20% reduction of IFN-γ and IL-10, respectively, in the coculture studies when compared to cytokine secretion by splenocytes cultured alone. The suppressive function was localized to the CD4+CD25+ compartment because coculture of CD4+CD25− cells from tolerant animals with splenocytes caused a 6.5- and 1.9-fold increase in IFN-γ and IL-10, respectively, compared to splenocytes alone. Phenotypic characterization of regulatory cells in tolerant mice showed a consistently higher number of CD4+GITR+ and CD4+FoxP3+ cells in both strains of mouse compared to HBSS-treated control mice. Additionally, in tolerant C57Bl/6 mice we observed an increase in CD4+CD25+CTLA-4+ and CD4+CD25+mTGF-β1+ cells. In vitro cytokine profiling demonstrated that splenocytes from tolerant Balb/c and C57Bl/6 were polarized toward a Th1 immune response. Taken together, these findings indicate that anti-CD3 induces tolerance to FVIII, and that the mechanism(s) regulating this response occurs through the generation of several distinct regulatory T cell lineages and by influencing cytokine production and profile. In light of these results, a short course of low-dose anti-CD3 treatment in patients at high risk of inhibitor development, with concomitant FVIII exposure administered prophylactically, in the absence of potentially “inflammatory” bleeding, may reduce the likelihood of inhibitor development.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».