MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2562352350 · doi:10.3138/cjh.48.3.494

<i>Early Modern Things: Objects and Their Histories, 1500-1800</i>, edited by Paula Findlen

2013· article· en· W2562352350 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Brandy Schillace

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of History · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReading (process)HistoryMedia studiesSociologyArt historyPhilosophyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Early Modern Things: Objects and Their Histories, 1500-1800, edited by Paula Findlen. New York, Routledge, 2013. xxiv, 389 pp. $45.95 US (paper). When I was a child of seven, my school teacher took me to task for using the word thing to describe--well, anything at all. It isn't precise, she said, and intelligent young ladies must use their words. The incident made so powerful an impression that even today, I find myself hovering over the keyboard with deep misgivings when t-h-i-n-g-s appear on the page. It was therefore with intrigue, excitement (and some alarm) that I approached this volume, an edited collection boldly asserting its very thingness. What, I wondered, could they possibly be up to? This volume, divided into six parts, examines early modern material culture through a range of very different approaches. Most of the essays have been written by historians, but covering a broad range of interests within that discipline; it also includes the perspective of communication and science studies (an essay by Chandra Mukerji) and Asian studies (Morgan Pitelka). Such breadth can make for uneven reading at times, but there is remarkable consistency, because all essays tell the story of the early modern world and how objects helped to make its emergence possible. In fact, our very understanding of this world is corporeal, and though shaped by many philosophies and economies, this wildly changing three-hundred-year period is just as much characterized by its ginseng (Carla Nappi), as it is by its beasts and birds (Marcy Norton) and its clockwork (Jessica Riskin). At the same time, the collection emphasizes the constantly changing nature of things. The three papers just mentioned are part of a section titled The Ambiguity of Things, and as Riskin explains, we often cannot even be sure we understand the real meaning of seemingly familiar things. The concept of clockwork, for instance, is fraught primarily because we have added our own latter-day (mechanical regularity) understanding to words that used to stand in for disquiet, fluidity, or conflict. The second section, Representing Things, also emphasizes change and the difficulty with which we can approach the meaning-making processes of the past. How can we know what was really being represented by the Dutch still-life painters (Julie Hochstrasser)? Can domestic inventories from the past help us to understand both the seen and unseen elements of the material world and the relative importance to those who made the lists (Giorgio Riello)? In Mukeiji's work, we are reminded that sometimes the surface is the reality; things--in this case costume --may have been considered appropriate identifiers of character in the sixteenth-century Ottoman Empire. Change is, on the one hand, brought about by things; but, on the other, those very help us separate our own preconceptions from the work itself. The work itself is very much the subject of the third section, Making Things. In fact, Pamela H. Smith actually makes things--following the recipe for silver casting as a way of addressing the oxymoronic ... hook of practice, a book (thing) and yet a method for making (p. 198). This article also illustrates--quite literally, with images--the problem of having only words to render a thing to our understanding. Corey Tazzara's essay discusses the way new goods entered the market, and also how a market was created for new goods--the ever changing value and demand of in seventeenth-century Italy--thus revealing the way great economic change may be reduced to things (and consumers!). It is a shame that this section does not contain a third essay, perhaps one that discusses the market for minutia in the eighteenth century, or even one on medical things like forceps, which were used to shift the meaning of midwife from female practitioner to male surgeon. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,315
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,931

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of HistoryMême sujetGlobal Maritime and Colonial HistoriesTravaux en français237 207