MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2562352350 · doi:10.3138/cjh.48.3.494

<i>Early Modern Things: Objects and Their Histories, 1500-1800</i>, edited by Paula Findlen

2013· article· en· W2562352350 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Brandy Schillace

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)HistoryMedia studiesSociologyArt historyPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early Modern Things: Objects and Their Histories, 1500-1800, edited by Paula Findlen. New York, Routledge, 2013. xxiv, 389 pp. $45.95 US (paper). When I was a child of seven, my school teacher took me to task for using the word thing to describe--well, anything at all. It isn't precise, she said, and intelligent young ladies must use their words. The incident made so powerful an impression that even today, I find myself hovering over the keyboard with deep misgivings when t-h-i-n-g-s appear on the page. It was therefore with intrigue, excitement (and some alarm) that I approached this volume, an edited collection boldly asserting its very thingness. What, I wondered, could they possibly be up to? This volume, divided into six parts, examines early modern material culture through a range of very different approaches. Most of the essays have been written by historians, but covering a broad range of interests within that discipline; it also includes the perspective of communication and science studies (an essay by Chandra Mukerji) and Asian studies (Morgan Pitelka). Such breadth can make for uneven reading at times, but there is remarkable consistency, because all essays tell the story of the early modern world and how objects helped to make its emergence possible. In fact, our very understanding of this world is corporeal, and though shaped by many philosophies and economies, this wildly changing three-hundred-year period is just as much characterized by its ginseng (Carla Nappi), as it is by its beasts and birds (Marcy Norton) and its clockwork (Jessica Riskin). At the same time, the collection emphasizes the constantly changing nature of things. The three papers just mentioned are part of a section titled The Ambiguity of Things, and as Riskin explains, we often cannot even be sure we understand the real meaning of seemingly familiar things. The concept of clockwork, for instance, is fraught primarily because we have added our own latter-day (mechanical regularity) understanding to words that used to stand in for disquiet, fluidity, or conflict. The second section, Representing Things, also emphasizes change and the difficulty with which we can approach the meaning-making processes of the past. How can we know what was really being represented by the Dutch still-life painters (Julie Hochstrasser)? Can domestic inventories from the past help us to understand both the seen and unseen elements of the material world and the relative importance to those who made the lists (Giorgio Riello)? In Mukeiji's work, we are reminded that sometimes the surface is the reality; things--in this case costume --may have been considered appropriate identifiers of character in the sixteenth-century Ottoman Empire. Change is, on the one hand, brought about by things; but, on the other, those very help us separate our own preconceptions from the work itself. The work itself is very much the subject of the third section, Making Things. In fact, Pamela H. Smith actually makes things--following the recipe for silver casting as a way of addressing the oxymoronic ... hook of practice, a book (thing) and yet a method for making (p. 198). This article also illustrates--quite literally, with images--the problem of having only words to render a thing to our understanding. Corey Tazzara's essay discusses the way new goods entered the market, and also how a market was created for new goods--the ever changing value and demand of in seventeenth-century Italy--thus revealing the way great economic change may be reduced to things (and consumers!). It is a shame that this section does not contain a third essay, perhaps one that discusses the market for minutia in the eighteenth century, or even one on medical things like forceps, which were used to shift the meaning of midwife from female practitioner to male surgeon. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HistorySame topicGlobal Maritime and Colonial HistoriesFrench-language works237,207