Museum Review: Dittrick Medical History Center
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Museum Review:Dittrick Medical History Center Jacob Steere-Williams and Cara Delay http://artsci.case.edu/dittrick/museum/ Readers of the Bulletin will need no introduction to the Dittrick Medical History Center at Case Western University in Cleveland, a leading medical history museum and archive. Those who were at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Association for the History of Medicine will no doubt recall their splendid microscope collection on display for the Garrison lecture reception. Historians of medicine will be interested to learn that on display at the museum are two collections that explore the commingled histories of birth and birth control. Upon entering the museum visitors are confronted with two visually stunning and historically critical objects that begin the “Reconceiving Birth” exhibit; a mid-nineteenth-century birthing chair—on loan from the Mutter Museum, Philadelphia—and an eighteenth century midwifery manikin modeled upon that of Madame du Coudray. “Reconceiving Birth” continues by deviating from a general, and mostly straightforward, history of birth as it has been told through a Western, and largely male dominated, lens to the perhaps more interesting, specific experience of birthing in Cleveland in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Seamlessly combining instruments, artefacts, texts, and digital technologies alongside an impressive secondary gloss, the exhibit dismisses the trend of streamlining museum exhibits with minimal text and hyperbole. Yet, we were both struck by a few weaknesses of the opening exhibit: the near linearity of the narrative and the missing voices of African Americans and women. This remains a male- and white-dominated exhibition. Visitors continuing through the museum, into the “Contraception Collection,” however, are forced to reconsider linearity and male hegemony. The Dittrick Museum acquired the Contraception Collection in 2004 from Canadian pharmacist Percy Skuy (formerly the president of Ortho Pharmaceutical); since then, the collection has grown to feature over one thousand artifacts chronicling the history of fertility control from the ancient world to the present [End Page 706] day. Among the more fascinating items in the Contraception Collection are an IUD made of airplane parts from a World War II prisoner-of-war camp in Indonesia, and candy wrappers used (allegedly) as condoms in Australia in the 1980s. Although its real strengths are in twentieth century American birth control methods, including IUDs, cervical caps, condoms, and oral contraceptives, the collection also features older folkloric traditions involving potions and plants—wild yams from Mexico, ancient Egyptian crocodile dung, and carrot seeds, which were recommended as an effective contraceptive by Hippocrates. It highlights, therefore, not only birth control methods produced by or advocated by pharmaceutical companies and the medical establishment, but also those practices that ordinary women across time and space have called upon to manage their fertility. Much to the credit of curator James Edmonson, the exhibit itself embodies the best practices of modern museums: its organization is clear and logical, and its space and flow encourage visitors to wander but also focus. Creating a balance between displaying artifacts and explaining them through text is a challenge for any museum, and particularly one that features such fascinating and sometimes-titillating material items. The Dittrick, however, has managed this balance beautifully, allowing visitors to focus their attention on the historical artifacts but also providing them with plenty of written background and context. Alongside Vienna’s Museum of Contraception and Abortion and the Museum of Sex in New York City, the Contraception Collection is a must-see for students of the history of medicine and sexuality, physicians, medical students, and more advanced researchers. It offers insight on not only the history of contraception but also urban history, the study of material culture, women’s and gender history, and the history of the body. [End Page 707] Jacob Steere-Williams and Cara Delay College of Charleston Copyright © 2016 Johns Hopkins University Press
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,234 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».