MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2562973208 · doi:10.1353/bhm.2016.0106

Museum Review: Dittrick Medical History Center

2016· article· en· W2562973208 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jacob Steere‐Williams, Cara Delay

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the history of medicine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedical History and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeHistoryHistory of medicineWhite (mutation)Art historyVisual artsArtClassicsLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Museum Review:Dittrick Medical History Center Jacob Steere-Williams and Cara Delay http://artsci.case.edu/dittrick/museum/ Readers of the Bulletin will need no introduction to the Dittrick Medical History Center at Case Western University in Cleveland, a leading medical history museum and archive. Those who were at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Association for the History of Medicine will no doubt recall their splendid microscope collection on display for the Garrison lecture reception. Historians of medicine will be interested to learn that on display at the museum are two collections that explore the commingled histories of birth and birth control. Upon entering the museum visitors are confronted with two visually stunning and historically critical objects that begin the “Reconceiving Birth” exhibit; a mid-nineteenth-century birthing chair—on loan from the Mutter Museum, Philadelphia—and an eighteenth century midwifery manikin modeled upon that of Madame du Coudray. “Reconceiving Birth” continues by deviating from a general, and mostly straightforward, history of birth as it has been told through a Western, and largely male dominated, lens to the perhaps more interesting, specific experience of birthing in Cleveland in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Seamlessly combining instruments, artefacts, texts, and digital technologies alongside an impressive secondary gloss, the exhibit dismisses the trend of streamlining museum exhibits with minimal text and hyperbole. Yet, we were both struck by a few weaknesses of the opening exhibit: the near linearity of the narrative and the missing voices of African Americans and women. This remains a male- and white-dominated exhibition. Visitors continuing through the museum, into the “Contraception Collection,” however, are forced to reconsider linearity and male hegemony. The Dittrick Museum acquired the Contraception Collection in 2004 from Canadian pharmacist Percy Skuy (formerly the president of Ortho Pharmaceutical); since then, the collection has grown to feature over one thousand artifacts chronicling the history of fertility control from the ancient world to the present [End Page 706] day. Among the more fascinating items in the Contraception Collection are an IUD made of airplane parts from a World War II prisoner-of-war camp in Indonesia, and candy wrappers used (allegedly) as condoms in Australia in the 1980s. Although its real strengths are in twentieth century American birth control methods, including IUDs, cervical caps, condoms, and oral contraceptives, the collection also features older folkloric traditions involving potions and plants—wild yams from Mexico, ancient Egyptian crocodile dung, and carrot seeds, which were recommended as an effective contraceptive by Hippocrates. It highlights, therefore, not only birth control methods produced by or advocated by pharmaceutical companies and the medical establishment, but also those practices that ordinary women across time and space have called upon to manage their fertility. Much to the credit of curator James Edmonson, the exhibit itself embodies the best practices of modern museums: its organization is clear and logical, and its space and flow encourage visitors to wander but also focus. Creating a balance between displaying artifacts and explaining them through text is a challenge for any museum, and particularly one that features such fascinating and sometimes-titillating material items. The Dittrick, however, has managed this balance beautifully, allowing visitors to focus their attention on the historical artifacts but also providing them with plenty of written background and context. Alongside Vienna’s Museum of Contraception and Abortion and the Museum of Sex in New York City, the Contraception Collection is a must-see for students of the history of medicine and sexuality, physicians, medical students, and more advanced researchers. It offers insight on not only the history of contraception but also urban history, the study of material culture, women’s and gender history, and the history of the body. [End Page 707] Jacob Steere-Williams and Cara Delay College of Charleston Copyright © 2016 Johns Hopkins University Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2340.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the history of medicineSame topicMedical History and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207