Prospective Laboratory Evaluation of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Donors: Results From an International Public Stool Bank
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background. Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a public health threat, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective therapy for recurrent CDI. Stool banks have emerged to reduce logistic complexity and enhance access to safe FMT. However, there is variability in pathogen-testing protocols and a paucity of data on the etiology of laboratory exclusions for universal stool donors. Methods. Consecutive candidate donors were evaluated from 10 January 2014 to 21 April 2016 in the greater Boston area. Candidates who passed an initial 178-point clinical assessment, including body mass index and waist circumference, were invited to undergo stool and serological-based tests at a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–certified laboratory (figure 1). Candidate donors who met the initial clinical and laboratory testing inclusion criteria were enrolled as active donors, and stool was collected for 60 days. All material collected during the 60-day period was held in quarantine until the donor passed a second identical clinical and laboratory assessment. All stool and serology panels performed in the study period on candidate and active donors were included. Results. Overall, 131 candidate donors passed clinical evaluation and proceed to have stool and serology testing. Overall, 65 pathogens were detected among 56 donors, primarily parasitic (32%), viral (34%), and bacterial (28%) pathogens (figure 2). Among ova and parasite exclusions, Blastocystis hominis (52%) and Endolimax nana (29%) were most common, despite ruling out high-risk travel exposures. Among viral pathogens, rotavirus (86%) was most common, although no overt risk factors were identified. Bacterial pathogens detected among the asymptomatic cohort also included Helicobacter pylori, vancomycin-resistant enterococcus, C. difficile, and Cryptosporidium. Of the 56 donors, 18 subjects (32%) had an abnormal laboratory test at their 60-day screen following a first set of normal investigations. No blood-borne infections were identified. Conclusion. Asymptomatic rotavirus and B. hominis are the most common laboratory etiologies of exclusion despite ruling out risk factors. Accordingly, FMT donors should be screened for these pathogens and continuous laboratory testing should be considered by stool banks, given the ongoing risk of asymptomatic pathogen carriage. Disclosures. K. Ling, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary; E. Koelsch, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary; N. Dubois, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary; K. O'Brien, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary; Z. Stoltzner, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary; P. Panchal, OpenBiome: Consultant, Consulting fee; Z. Kassam, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary; Finch Scientific: Consultant and Shareholder, Equity and Research support; M. Osman, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».