Prospective Laboratory Evaluation of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Donors: Results From an International Public Stool Bank
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a public health threat, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective therapy for recurrent CDI. Stool banks have emerged to reduce logistic complexity and enhance access to safe FMT. However, there is variability in pathogen-testing protocols and a paucity of data on the etiology of laboratory exclusions for universal stool donors. Methods. Consecutive candidate donors were evaluated from 10 January 2014 to 21 April 2016 in the greater Boston area. Candidates who passed an initial 178-point clinical assessment, including body mass index and waist circumference, were invited to undergo stool and serological-based tests at a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–certified laboratory (figure 1). Candidate donors who met the initial clinical and laboratory testing inclusion criteria were enrolled as active donors, and stool was collected for 60 days. All material collected during the 60-day period was held in quarantine until the donor passed a second identical clinical and laboratory assessment. All stool and serology panels performed in the study period on candidate and active donors were included. Results. Overall, 131 candidate donors passed clinical evaluation and proceed to have stool and serology testing. Overall, 65 pathogens were detected among 56 donors, primarily parasitic (32%), viral (34%), and bacterial (28%) pathogens (figure 2). Among ova and parasite exclusions, Blastocystis hominis (52%) and Endolimax nana (29%) were most common, despite ruling out high-risk travel exposures. Among viral pathogens, rotavirus (86%) was most common, although no overt risk factors were identified. Bacterial pathogens detected among the asymptomatic cohort also included Helicobacter pylori, vancomycin-resistant enterococcus, C. difficile, and Cryptosporidium. Of the 56 donors, 18 subjects (32%) had an abnormal laboratory test at their 60-day screen following a first set of normal investigations. No blood-borne infections were identified. Conclusion. Asymptomatic rotavirus and B. hominis are the most common laboratory etiologies of exclusion despite ruling out risk factors. Accordingly, FMT donors should be screened for these pathogens and continuous laboratory testing should be considered by stool banks, given the ongoing risk of asymptomatic pathogen carriage. Disclosures. K. Ling, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary; E. Koelsch, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary; N. Dubois, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary; K. O'Brien, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary; Z. Stoltzner, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary; P. Panchal, OpenBiome: Consultant, Consulting fee; Z. Kassam, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary; Finch Scientific: Consultant and Shareholder, Equity and Research support; M. Osman, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".