<i>The Royal Navy and the German Threat 1901-1914: Admiralty Plans to Protect British Trade in a War against Germany</i>, by Matthew S. Seligmann
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Royal Navy and the German Threat 1901-1914: Admiralty Plans to Protect British Trade in a War against Germany, by Matthew S. Seligmann. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012. x, 186 pp. $110.00 US (cloth). Historians of the Royal Navy in the pre-First World War period have long accepted that the two principal challenges facing naval planners at the turn of the twentieth century were those of safeguarding British seaborne trade and securing the United Kingdom from a hostile invasion. The widespread acknowledgement of this fact makes all the more extraordinary the consistent failure of scholars to adequately address how the Admiralty intended to prevent hostile operations against British shipping. This volume is a welcome, and highly successful, attempt to address this significant gap in the existing historiography. Matthew S. Seligmann argues that, by devoting their focus on the prospective danger of French or Russian cruiser warfare against British trade, previous writers have overlooked other important dangers to British commerce. Making an extensive use of German archival material, he demonstrates that, from 1898 onwards, the German admiralty staff planned to make an extensive use of armed merchant cruisers to deliver a paralyzing blow to British trade at the outset of an Anglo-German war. Due to Britain's reliance upon imported foodstuffs, the Germans hoped that such a blow could potentially produce an effect on the British public sufficient to induce the government to sue for an early peace. Aware that the Royal Navy would seal the North Sea at the outbreak of war, the Germans thus contemplated using merchant vessels already on the trade routes to instigate this campaign against British shipping. Their government therefore extensively subsidized the construction of large, fast oceanic liners in exchange for design features intended to allow for the rapid mounting of guns in wartime. After detailing these plans, the author goes on to demonstrate their effect upon Britain's naval leadership. A detailed exposition of Navy's awareness of German intentions and the palpable concerns of key figures at the Admiralty provides significant authority to the book's argument and builds on the author's previous work on British naval and military intelligence before the First World War. After illustrating the existence of the danger and the Admiralty's very real concerns with the prospect of German armed merchant cruisers attacking British trade routes, Seligmann goes on to chart the various means by which the Admiralty planned to meet this danger. In doing so, he enters the thorny debate regarding the conception of what were later to be known as Battle Cruisers by the Fisher Admiralty in 1904-5. There, he persuasively argues that an important factor in the design of these craft was the need to provide the Navy with a vessel capable of catching and destroying the large ocean-going liners which the German government subsidized for conversion into armed merchant cruisers in wartime. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».