MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563329080 · doi:10.3138/cjh.48.2.341

<i>The Royal Navy and the German Threat 1901-1914: Admiralty Plans to Protect British Trade in a War against Germany</i>, by Matthew S. Seligmann

2013· article· en· W2563329080 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Morgan-Owen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNavyGermanLawHistoryEconomic historySpanish Civil WarSafeguardingPolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Royal Navy and the German Threat 1901-1914: Admiralty Plans to Protect British Trade in a War against Germany, by Matthew S. Seligmann. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012. x, 186 pp. $110.00 US (cloth). Historians of the Royal Navy in the pre-First World War period have long accepted that the two principal challenges facing naval planners at the turn of the twentieth century were those of safeguarding British seaborne trade and securing the United Kingdom from a hostile invasion. The widespread acknowledgement of this fact makes all the more extraordinary the consistent failure of scholars to adequately address how the Admiralty intended to prevent hostile operations against British shipping. This volume is a welcome, and highly successful, attempt to address this significant gap in the existing historiography. Matthew S. Seligmann argues that, by devoting their focus on the prospective danger of French or Russian cruiser warfare against British trade, previous writers have overlooked other important dangers to British commerce. Making an extensive use of German archival material, he demonstrates that, from 1898 onwards, the German admiralty staff planned to make an extensive use of armed merchant cruisers to deliver a paralyzing blow to British trade at the outset of an Anglo-German war. Due to Britain's reliance upon imported foodstuffs, the Germans hoped that such a blow could potentially produce an effect on the British public sufficient to induce the government to sue for an early peace. Aware that the Royal Navy would seal the North Sea at the outbreak of war, the Germans thus contemplated using merchant vessels already on the trade routes to instigate this campaign against British shipping. Their government therefore extensively subsidized the construction of large, fast oceanic liners in exchange for design features intended to allow for the rapid mounting of guns in wartime. After detailing these plans, the author goes on to demonstrate their effect upon Britain's naval leadership. A detailed exposition of Navy's awareness of German intentions and the palpable concerns of key figures at the Admiralty provides significant authority to the book's argument and builds on the author's previous work on British naval and military intelligence before the First World War. After illustrating the existence of the danger and the Admiralty's very real concerns with the prospect of German armed merchant cruisers attacking British trade routes, Seligmann goes on to chart the various means by which the Admiralty planned to meet this danger. In doing so, he enters the thorny debate regarding the conception of what were later to be known as Battle Cruisers by the Fisher Admiralty in 1904-5. There, he persuasively argues that an important factor in the design of these craft was the need to provide the Navy with a vessel capable of catching and destroying the large ocean-going liners which the German government subsidized for conversion into armed merchant cruisers in wartime. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HistorySame topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207