Hoxa9/Meis1 Mediate Leukemic Programming through Microrna-155
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Synergistic deregulation of HOXA9 and the HOX-gene cofactor MEIS1 is a commonly observed phenomenon in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The leukemogenic potential of aberrant Hoxa9 and Meis1 expression has been shown in several AML models. However, the molecular mechanisms behind Hoxa9- and Meis1-induced leukemogenesis are still not well understood. In order to identify functionally relevant Meis1-induced microRNAs (miRNA), we profiled the global miRNA expression using a Hoxa9-Meis1 murine AML progression model. This two-step model allowed us to quantify miRNAs at a pre-leukemic stage through the overexpression of the proto-oncogene Hoxa9 (Hoxa9/ctrl), as well as after full leukemic transformation through co-overexpression of Hoxa9 and Meis1 (Hoxa9/Meis1). The pre-leukemic stage is characterized by in vitro immortalization without in vivo engraftment, whereas the transplanted leukemic cells induce full-blown AML in vivo. MiR-155 turned out to be one of the most significant differentially expressed miRNA species and its upregulation was independently validated in Hoxa9/Meis1 cells by qRT-PCR. Subsequent analysis of various AML subtypes (CN-AML, t(11q23), t(8;21), t(15;17), n=38) showed significantly elevated levels of miR-155 in CN-AML with NPM1mut (n=10, p<0.01) and AML with t(11q23) (n=8, p<0.05) compared to healthy donor bone marrow (MNC). These results are in line with overexpression of HOXA9 (CN-AML NPM1mut: p<0.05, t(11q23): p<0.05) and MEIS1 (CN-AML NPM1mut: p<0.01, t(11q23): p<0.05) in these AML samples compared to healthy donor bone marrow cells (MNC). Expression analysis of miR-155 in healthy murine bone marrow (mbm) cells revealed miR-155 enrichment in hematopoietic stem- and progenitor cells compared to mature myeloid cells (p<0.05), mirroring a similar expression pattern as observed for Meis1. Therefore, to dissect the leukemic potential of miR-155 to program mbm, 5-FU-stimulated mbm cells were retrovirally transduced with miR-155, leading to significantly increased proliferation in vitro (p<0.05). This finding suggests enhancement of self-renewal on the stem-/progenitor cell level by miR-155. Furthermore, mbm cells overexpressing Hoxa9 together with miR-155 (Hoxa9/miR-155) significantly increased colony formation (p<0.05) in a methylcellulose assay. In turn, absence of miR-155 (miR-155-/- mbm) significantly reduced colony formation in conjunction with Hoxa9 (p<0.05) and MLL-AF9 (p=0.05), a known positive regulator of Hoxa9 and Meis1. These findings suggest a role for miR-155 in both proliferation and self-renewal indicating that the oncogenic program of Hoxa9/Meis1 relies on the presence of miR-155. The leukemic potency of Hoxa9/miR-155 was further investigated in a murine transplantation model in vivo. Transplantation of mbm co-overexpressing Hoxa9/miR-155 led to significantly increased engraftment levels already after four weeks (wks) (57.8%±31.3, n=16) compared to Hoxa9/ctrl (11.7%±19.3%, p<0.0001, n=17), but less than with Hoxa9/Meis1 (74.5%±20.3%, p<0.01, n=14). In contrast to Hoxa9/ctrl (22±7 wks), mice that received Hoxa9/miR-155 mbm cells had a significantly accelerated onset of a myeloproliferative disease (MPD)-like leukemia within 11 wks (11±6 wks, p<0.0001), but still a less aggressive course of disease compared to mice transplanted with Hoxa9/Meis1 (5±1 wks, p<0.0001). This result is striking considering the aggressive nature of the Hoxa9/Meis1 AML model and given how little is known about its central mechanisms. It also highlights the relevant contribution of miR-155 to the leukemic programming induced by Hoxa9/Meis1 and provides a further rational to target miR-155 in AML. Considering the central role of the Hoxa9/Meis1 in both myeloid and lymphoid acute leukemias, we demonstrate for the first time the leukemogenic relevance of a miRNA within this transcriptional axis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».