Hoxa9/Meis1 Mediate Leukemic Programming through Microrna-155
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Synergistic deregulation of HOXA9 and the HOX-gene cofactor MEIS1 is a commonly observed phenomenon in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The leukemogenic potential of aberrant Hoxa9 and Meis1 expression has been shown in several AML models. However, the molecular mechanisms behind Hoxa9- and Meis1-induced leukemogenesis are still not well understood. In order to identify functionally relevant Meis1-induced microRNAs (miRNA), we profiled the global miRNA expression using a Hoxa9-Meis1 murine AML progression model. This two-step model allowed us to quantify miRNAs at a pre-leukemic stage through the overexpression of the proto-oncogene Hoxa9 (Hoxa9/ctrl), as well as after full leukemic transformation through co-overexpression of Hoxa9 and Meis1 (Hoxa9/Meis1). The pre-leukemic stage is characterized by in vitro immortalization without in vivo engraftment, whereas the transplanted leukemic cells induce full-blown AML in vivo. MiR-155 turned out to be one of the most significant differentially expressed miRNA species and its upregulation was independently validated in Hoxa9/Meis1 cells by qRT-PCR. Subsequent analysis of various AML subtypes (CN-AML, t(11q23), t(8;21), t(15;17), n=38) showed significantly elevated levels of miR-155 in CN-AML with NPM1mut (n=10, p<0.01) and AML with t(11q23) (n=8, p<0.05) compared to healthy donor bone marrow (MNC). These results are in line with overexpression of HOXA9 (CN-AML NPM1mut: p<0.05, t(11q23): p<0.05) and MEIS1 (CN-AML NPM1mut: p<0.01, t(11q23): p<0.05) in these AML samples compared to healthy donor bone marrow cells (MNC). Expression analysis of miR-155 in healthy murine bone marrow (mbm) cells revealed miR-155 enrichment in hematopoietic stem- and progenitor cells compared to mature myeloid cells (p<0.05), mirroring a similar expression pattern as observed for Meis1. Therefore, to dissect the leukemic potential of miR-155 to program mbm, 5-FU-stimulated mbm cells were retrovirally transduced with miR-155, leading to significantly increased proliferation in vitro (p<0.05). This finding suggests enhancement of self-renewal on the stem-/progenitor cell level by miR-155. Furthermore, mbm cells overexpressing Hoxa9 together with miR-155 (Hoxa9/miR-155) significantly increased colony formation (p<0.05) in a methylcellulose assay. In turn, absence of miR-155 (miR-155-/- mbm) significantly reduced colony formation in conjunction with Hoxa9 (p<0.05) and MLL-AF9 (p=0.05), a known positive regulator of Hoxa9 and Meis1. These findings suggest a role for miR-155 in both proliferation and self-renewal indicating that the oncogenic program of Hoxa9/Meis1 relies on the presence of miR-155. The leukemic potency of Hoxa9/miR-155 was further investigated in a murine transplantation model in vivo. Transplantation of mbm co-overexpressing Hoxa9/miR-155 led to significantly increased engraftment levels already after four weeks (wks) (57.8%±31.3, n=16) compared to Hoxa9/ctrl (11.7%±19.3%, p<0.0001, n=17), but less than with Hoxa9/Meis1 (74.5%±20.3%, p<0.01, n=14). In contrast to Hoxa9/ctrl (22±7 wks), mice that received Hoxa9/miR-155 mbm cells had a significantly accelerated onset of a myeloproliferative disease (MPD)-like leukemia within 11 wks (11±6 wks, p<0.0001), but still a less aggressive course of disease compared to mice transplanted with Hoxa9/Meis1 (5±1 wks, p<0.0001). This result is striking considering the aggressive nature of the Hoxa9/Meis1 AML model and given how little is known about its central mechanisms. It also highlights the relevant contribution of miR-155 to the leukemic programming induced by Hoxa9/Meis1 and provides a further rational to target miR-155 in AML. Considering the central role of the Hoxa9/Meis1 in both myeloid and lymphoid acute leukemias, we demonstrate for the first time the leukemogenic relevance of a miRNA within this transcriptional axis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".