MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2569863830 · doi:10.32469/10355/56826

Alloparental care in two societies : who helps and in what circumstances

2016· dissertation· en· W2569863830 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gretchen Perry

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueChild Welfare and Adoption
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGrandparentNext of kinAgency (philosophy)Extended familyPsychologyRelocationImmediate familyDevelopmental psychologyMedicineSocial psychologyGenealogySociologyPolitical scienceHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This dissertation investigated "alloparenting" -the provision of child care and other supports to children by people other than their parents -in two societies.The first project involved analyses of Canadian child protection cases.When parents are unable to care for their children, it is now common practice to try to place those children in the care of "kin", but we do not yet know all that we should about which particular relatives take on the onerous task of fostering children with difficult backgrounds, nor about the determinants of how well the children fare.I created a data-base covering all such kin placements over a three-year period under the auspices of one Canadian child protection agency.I was especially interested in which maternal and paternal relatives of the children accepted this role and whether the kin placements were stable, as opposed to "breaking down" with the child having to move to another home.Ninety percent of genetically related kin caregivers were grandparents or other equally close kin.Relatives of the mother provided placements far more often than father's family, a difference that was most striking with single grandmothers.Placements with maternal and paternal kin had similar durations, but those with the mother's family were more likely to end well, with the child returning to a parent or obtaining a permanent family home elsewhere (permanency), whereas placements with father's family more often ended poorly, with a move to another foster home, incarceration, or the child running away (placement breakdown).Placements with father's family were more than twice as likely to break down as placements with mother's family, within a given time frame (when child sex, age, reason for placement and caregiver factors were taken into consideration).It was also found that mother's family were providing care in more difficult circumstances: when they were poor, unemployed, single, relatively uneducated, and suffering from serious health problems.Most prior research on who helps parents raise their children indicates that mother's kin are more frequent and more beneficial alloparents than father's kin.But would this still be the case in societies in which a woman moves to her husband's family after marriage and engages in purdah (the seclusion of women)?Rural Bangladesh is such a place and was the setting for the second project.When mothers in intact first marriages were asked about their living arrangements and who provided care and assistance to their children, they reported that despite cultural expectations that wives live in the family compound of their inlaws, scarcely more than half actually did so; many instead dwelt with husband and children on their own property, and if the father was an absent migrant laborer (working in the city or overseas), 22% lived with the mother's family.The mother's relatives outnumbered the father's as primary resource providers (beyond the nuclear household) and mother's brothers in particular outnumbered father's brothers by a wide margin.The children in this population are almost all short in stature and underweight in relation to World Health Organization norms, and this is especially so among the poorer families, but in addition to the effects of family income, living in the father's family compound was associated with further height and weight deficits compared to the children of parents living on their own property separate from either extended family.Children were less behind for height and weight the more education their father had, and they were less behind in their education, the more educated their mother was.Residing with mother's family was also associated with better educated children, as was having the mother's mother be the child's secondary caretaker.In a further set of analyses, I compared the visiting behaviour reported by interviewed Bangladeshi mothers of dependent children in intact two-parent families to the reports of widowed and divorced mothers.Despite the impediments created by the fact that the interviewed women often lived with their in-laws and observed

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,340
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,676

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,005
Communication savante0,0040,003
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,319
Écart entre enseignants0,309 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetChild Welfare and AdoptionTravaux en français237 207