MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2571511731 · doi:10.1182/blood.v120.21.2197.2197

Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia Treated with Eltrombopag in the PETIT Study.

2012· article· en· W2571511731 sur OpenAlexaff
Victor S. Blanchette, Kelly M. Grotzinger, Lisa M Marcello, Kalpana Bakshi, Andrés Brainsky

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEltrombopagMedicineThrombopoietin receptorImmune thrombocytopeniaQuality of life (healthcare)CohortIncidence (geometry)Internal medicinePlaceboPediatricsRomiplostimThrombopoietinPlatelet

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2197 Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a disease characterized by low platelet counts that in children commonly follows an acute self-limiting course but becomes chronic (cITP) in approximately 25% of cases. Quality of life of patients and families is negatively affected by restriction of age-appropriate activities, hemorrhagic manifestations, fear of bleeding, or therapeutic complications (Blanchette 2010). Eltrombopag is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for treatment of cITP; PETIT is a 24-week open-label and randomized, placebo-controlled trial of eltrombopag in children with cITP who failed an initial therapy and have platelets <30,000/μL. We report preliminary health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results from PETIT derived from applying the Kids' ITP Tools (KIT; Barnard 2003; Klaassen 2007). Methods: Initially, 15 patients were enrolled in 3 age cohorts (12–17, 6–11, 1–5 years) and received open-label eltrombopag. Additional patients in each cohort were enrolled into the randomized phase once initial safety and efficacy data became available from the open-label phase. The KIT is scored from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), and was completed by patients in the 2 older cohorts and by parents/guardians of all patients at study entry and treatment weeks 6, 12, and 24. Results: HRQoL data for the 15 open-label patients, 5 from each cohort, are presented. At baseline, 9 (60%) patients had platelets ≤15,000/μL and the incidence of bleeding WHO grades 1–4 and 2–4 was 87% (13/15) and 33% (5/15), respectively. All patients completed 24 weeks of treatment. The mean KIT score at baseline for the 10 patients who were 6–17 years old was 65.7 (range, 42.3–85.6; median, 66.3; parents/guardians mean, 61.9) (Figure 1); the mean baseline score reported by parents on behalf of their children (n=15) was 66.5 (range, 43.0–93.3; median, 64.4). At Week 24, among the 10 patients completing the KIT, 9 had higher scores at Week 24 compared to baseline (mean, 19.6-point improvement; median, 19.2; range, 4.8–37.5). Eight of 9 patients had at least a 5-point increase in score (mean, 21.4-point improvement; median, 20.2; range, 6.7–37.5); an additional patient had a score increase of 4.8 points (80.8 at baseline to 85.6 at Week 24). The remaining patient, who had severely fluctuating platelet counts, had a reduced KIT score compared with baseline by 12.5 points (76.9 at baseline, 64.4 at Week 24). Among parent/guardian assessments, 13/15 reported improved KIT scores at Week 24 (mean, 17.9-point improvement; median, 15.4; range, 2.9–41.1; 1 score was last observation carried forward [LOCF]) (Figure 2). Eleven of 15 had at least a 5-point increase in score (mean, 20.5-point improvement; median, 15.7; range, 11.5–41.1). Two parents scored lower than baseline at 24 weeks: parents of the patient with fluctuating platelets (14.4-point reduction; 64.4 at baseline, 50.0 at Week 24) and of a 4-year-old who failed to respond to eltrombopag (40.4-point reduction; 93.3 at baseline, 52.9 at LOCF [Week 12]). Discussion/conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that treatment with eltrombopag is associated with improvements in HRQoL in children with cITP. Final results of PETIT should further the understanding of the potential of eltrombopag treatment to improve HRQoL in pediatric patients and further validate the use of the KIT in assessing treatment outcomes of childhood cITP. Disclosures: Off Label Use: The safety and efficacy of eltrombopag in pediatric patients have not been established. Grotzinger:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Marcello:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bakshi:GlaxoSmithLine: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brainsky:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→