MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia Treated with Eltrombopag in the PETIT Study.

2012· article· en· W2571511731 on OpenAlexaff
Victor S. Blanchette, Kelly M. Grotzinger, Lisa M Marcello, Kalpana Bakshi, Andrés Brainsky

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEltrombopagMedicineThrombopoietin receptorImmune thrombocytopeniaQuality of life (healthcare)CohortIncidence (geometry)Internal medicinePlaceboPediatricsRomiplostimThrombopoietinPlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2197 Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a disease characterized by low platelet counts that in children commonly follows an acute self-limiting course but becomes chronic (cITP) in approximately 25% of cases. Quality of life of patients and families is negatively affected by restriction of age-appropriate activities, hemorrhagic manifestations, fear of bleeding, or therapeutic complications (Blanchette 2010). Eltrombopag is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for treatment of cITP; PETIT is a 24-week open-label and randomized, placebo-controlled trial of eltrombopag in children with cITP who failed an initial therapy and have platelets <30,000/μL. We report preliminary health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results from PETIT derived from applying the Kids' ITP Tools (KIT; Barnard 2003; Klaassen 2007). Methods: Initially, 15 patients were enrolled in 3 age cohorts (12–17, 6–11, 1–5 years) and received open-label eltrombopag. Additional patients in each cohort were enrolled into the randomized phase once initial safety and efficacy data became available from the open-label phase. The KIT is scored from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), and was completed by patients in the 2 older cohorts and by parents/guardians of all patients at study entry and treatment weeks 6, 12, and 24. Results: HRQoL data for the 15 open-label patients, 5 from each cohort, are presented. At baseline, 9 (60%) patients had platelets ≤15,000/μL and the incidence of bleeding WHO grades 1–4 and 2–4 was 87% (13/15) and 33% (5/15), respectively. All patients completed 24 weeks of treatment. The mean KIT score at baseline for the 10 patients who were 6–17 years old was 65.7 (range, 42.3–85.6; median, 66.3; parents/guardians mean, 61.9) (Figure 1); the mean baseline score reported by parents on behalf of their children (n=15) was 66.5 (range, 43.0–93.3; median, 64.4). At Week 24, among the 10 patients completing the KIT, 9 had higher scores at Week 24 compared to baseline (mean, 19.6-point improvement; median, 19.2; range, 4.8–37.5). Eight of 9 patients had at least a 5-point increase in score (mean, 21.4-point improvement; median, 20.2; range, 6.7–37.5); an additional patient had a score increase of 4.8 points (80.8 at baseline to 85.6 at Week 24). The remaining patient, who had severely fluctuating platelet counts, had a reduced KIT score compared with baseline by 12.5 points (76.9 at baseline, 64.4 at Week 24). Among parent/guardian assessments, 13/15 reported improved KIT scores at Week 24 (mean, 17.9-point improvement; median, 15.4; range, 2.9–41.1; 1 score was last observation carried forward [LOCF]) (Figure 2). Eleven of 15 had at least a 5-point increase in score (mean, 20.5-point improvement; median, 15.7; range, 11.5–41.1). Two parents scored lower than baseline at 24 weeks: parents of the patient with fluctuating platelets (14.4-point reduction; 64.4 at baseline, 50.0 at Week 24) and of a 4-year-old who failed to respond to eltrombopag (40.4-point reduction; 93.3 at baseline, 52.9 at LOCF [Week 12]). Discussion/conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that treatment with eltrombopag is associated with improvements in HRQoL in children with cITP. Final results of PETIT should further the understanding of the potential of eltrombopag treatment to improve HRQoL in pediatric patients and further validate the use of the KIT in assessing treatment outcomes of childhood cITP. Disclosures: Off Label Use: The safety and efficacy of eltrombopag in pediatric patients have not been established. Grotzinger:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Marcello:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bakshi:GlaxoSmithLine: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brainsky:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→