Notice bibliographique
Résumé
THE CLASH WITHIN Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future Martha C. Nussbaum Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007. 403PP, US$29.95 cloth (ISBN 978-0674024823)The acts of genocide that were the Gujarat pogroms of 2002 are arguably the most shameful events in India's recent past. In response to a fire that had consumed a railway coach and killed 58 Hindu passengers returning from a religious pilgrimage, Hindus set out on a horrendously brutal rampage. In an organized and orchestrated manner, Hindu nationalists, with the blessing of the ruling party, targeted Muslim neighbourhoods, killing more than a thousand Muslims, raping and sexually torturing Muslim women, and burning and looting Muslim houses. The cause of the railway coach fire is still unknown, but while initially there were rumours that it had been set by Muslims, it is now speculated that kerosene oil stoves used by the pilgrims themselves were likely to blame. In her most recent book, Martha Nussbaum centres two important arguments around this particular episode: one relating to the resiliency of Indian democracy in the face of a crisis of religious minority accommodation, and the other suggesting that North American and European democracies might learn from India's experiences of accepting its pluralism and the complexities and tensions embedded in accommodating differences. In a perceptive examination of the Indian case, she points out that Huntington's thesis of a clash of civilizations - Islam versus the west - does not hold. Instead, she argues that the clash is fundamentally at two levels: at the macro level of the nation and at the micro level of the individual. In all nations, according to this view, there is a constant tension between those who accept differences and accord equal respect to others, and those, particularly among the majority, who seek homogenization and a single worldview. For the individual, the clash is between, on the one hand, the desire and urge to dominate and, on the other, the willingness and the obligation to live with others on equal terms, respecting differences whatever the consequences.In this passionately written and engaging book, Nussbaum takes us through a thorough analysis of the Gujarat pogroms. She explains why Gujarat was the site of this tragedy: it borders on Pakistan, has a more educated and urbanized Muslim population compared with the rest of India, was experiencing increased foreign investment and a weak labour movement, and had a poor education system of rote learning that failed to encourage critical thinking. In the course of her analysis, we are made familiar with different faces of the Hindu right; India's three founding fathers - Gandhi, Tagore, and Nehru; Indian constitutional principles enshrining both individual rights and group rights and the contradictions emerging out of these paradoxical principles; and the rise and dominance of the Hindu right and its assault on Indian history text books and scholars both within and outside India who did not support so-called authentic Indian history and the so-called positive image of the Hindu religion abroad.Although Nussbaum does not overtly posit a theoretical linkage between political institutions and the role of the political leadership and their vision, the resilience of Indian democracy can be attributed to the vision of the founding fathers (Gandhi the spiritual visionary, Tagore the educator, and Nehru the statesman with practical skills); the successful construction of its constitution; and the implementation of its various basic principles such as fundamental rights, judicial review, federalism, and the parliamentary system. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,027 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».