MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2572713989 · doi:10.1177/002070200806300329

Review: The Clash Within

2008· article· en· W2572713989 on OpenAlexaff
Reeta Chowdhari Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian History and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceInternational tradeLaw and economicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THE CLASH WITHIN Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future Martha C. Nussbaum Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007. 403PP, US$29.95 cloth (ISBN 978-0674024823)The acts of genocide that were the Gujarat pogroms of 2002 are arguably the most shameful events in India's recent past. In response to a fire that had consumed a railway coach and killed 58 Hindu passengers returning from a religious pilgrimage, Hindus set out on a horrendously brutal rampage. In an organized and orchestrated manner, Hindu nationalists, with the blessing of the ruling party, targeted Muslim neighbourhoods, killing more than a thousand Muslims, raping and sexually torturing Muslim women, and burning and looting Muslim houses. The cause of the railway coach fire is still unknown, but while initially there were rumours that it had been set by Muslims, it is now speculated that kerosene oil stoves used by the pilgrims themselves were likely to blame. In her most recent book, Martha Nussbaum centres two important arguments around this particular episode: one relating to the resiliency of Indian democracy in the face of a crisis of religious minority accommodation, and the other suggesting that North American and European democracies might learn from India's experiences of accepting its pluralism and the complexities and tensions embedded in accommodating differences. In a perceptive examination of the Indian case, she points out that Huntington's thesis of a clash of civilizations - Islam versus the west - does not hold. Instead, she argues that the clash is fundamentally at two levels: at the macro level of the nation and at the micro level of the individual. In all nations, according to this view, there is a constant tension between those who accept differences and accord equal respect to others, and those, particularly among the majority, who seek homogenization and a single worldview. For the individual, the clash is between, on the one hand, the desire and urge to dominate and, on the other, the willingness and the obligation to live with others on equal terms, respecting differences whatever the consequences.In this passionately written and engaging book, Nussbaum takes us through a thorough analysis of the Gujarat pogroms. She explains why Gujarat was the site of this tragedy: it borders on Pakistan, has a more educated and urbanized Muslim population compared with the rest of India, was experiencing increased foreign investment and a weak labour movement, and had a poor education system of rote learning that failed to encourage critical thinking. In the course of her analysis, we are made familiar with different faces of the Hindu right; India's three founding fathers - Gandhi, Tagore, and Nehru; Indian constitutional principles enshrining both individual rights and group rights and the contradictions emerging out of these paradoxical principles; and the rise and dominance of the Hindu right and its assault on Indian history text books and scholars both within and outside India who did not support so-called authentic Indian history and the so-called positive image of the Hindu religion abroad.Although Nussbaum does not overtly posit a theoretical linkage between political institutions and the role of the political leadership and their vision, the resilience of Indian democracy can be attributed to the vision of the founding fathers (Gandhi the spiritual visionary, Tagore the educator, and Nehru the statesman with practical skills); the successful construction of its constitution; and the implementation of its various basic principles such as fundamental rights, judicial review, federalism, and the parliamentary system. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy AnalysisSame topicIndian History and PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207