Notice bibliographique
Résumé
3 APRIL 1920 * 6 FEBRUARY 2007 TOM ROSENMEYER, who died of cardiac arrest at his home in Oakland at the age of eighty-six, was an admired and distinctive presence in both classical and literary studies, uniting in his person and his scholarly enterprise the best of his German background and of the American identity he embraced. He was born and raised in Hamburg, Germany, where he received traditional training in Greek and Latin at the Johanneum Gymnasium. In 1939 the increasingly ominous Nazi persecution of the Jews forced him to flee to England. Within a year, he was interned by the British as a citizen of an enemy state and hence a putative danger to the Crown and was sent to an internment camp in Canada. Life at the camp did not prove to be as bleak as one might have imagined. Among those interned with him were the future classicist Martin Ostwald and the future theologian of post-Holocaust Judaism, Emil Fackenheim. With these and other young men of scholarly inclinations in the camp, Tom pursued further reading in Greek and Latin as well as the study of Arabic, Hebrew, and Sanskrit. In 1942 he was released from internment and went on to do a degree in Classics at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, followed by an M. A. in Classics at the University of Toronto, completed in 1945. From there he came to the United States for two years of doctoral studies at Harvard before going in 1947 to his first academic position at the University of Iowa, where he taught while working on his dissertation on Plato, a project he would complete in 1949. At the same time, he undertook a translation of Bruno Snell's groundbreaking study of Greek language and thought, The Discovery of the Mind. The translation appeared in 1953. From 1952 to 1955 he taught Classics at Smith College. Then he moved to the University of Washington, where he would remain for eleven years. In 1966 he was invited to join the Department of Classics and the newly formed Department of Comparative Literature at the University of California at Berkeley. He served as professor of Greek and comparative literature at Berkeley until his retirement in 1990. The weaving together of these two fields was entirely natural for Tom and suggests something of the ease with which he moved between different worlds, and not only these two. All of his life he would be a meticulous student of the Classics - scholarly, philologically rigorous, minutely attentive to the voluminous secondary literature on the subjects he dealt with - and he expected these same qualities from his colleagues and students. There was something of the Germanic professor in his professional conscientiousness, his impatience with intellectual shoddiness, the careful orderliness with which he conducted his work. He would write in his microscopic hand on an index card a concise abstract and evaluation of every scholarly book he read. He would respond in that same microscopic script (until the advent of email) within a day or two to any writing given him by students or colleagues, usually with encouraging words, but never disguising his objections. Yet his engagement with classical and later literature was by no means pedantic or merely technical. He was passionate about literature, and till his dying day he was an avid and restless reader of texts from many periods in several different languages, as eager to discuss a new novel by Ian McEwan as a recent study of Greek political thought. Precisely for this reason, he was the ideal classicist for a department of comparative literature, and he played a crucial role in setting the direction for the Berkeley department and influencing several generations of its students for almost a quarter of a century. The catholicity of his interests as a reader was linked to the urbanity of his character and cultural identity. He was keenly curious about all kinds of people and all kinds of cultural phenomena. Unlike so many who immigrated to this country from Germany as adults, he spoke American English virtually without a foreign accent and wrote graceful, at times witty, English prose. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».