MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2574380159 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.329.329

Tosedostat Plus Low Dose Cytarabine Induces a High Rate of Responses That Can be Predicted By Genetic Profiling in Elderly AML

2015· article· en· W2574380159 sur OpenAlexaff
Giuseppe Visani, Federica Loscocco, Fabio Fuligni, Eliana Zuffa, Alberto Sensi, Alfonso Zaccaria, Gerardo Musuraca, Barbara Giannini, Alessandro Lucchesi, Francesca Fabbri, Anna Maria Mianulli, Patrizia Tosi, Michela Tonelli, Anna Candoni, Renato Fanin, Giovanni Sparaventi, Marco Gobbi, Marino Clavio, Marco Rocchi, Pier Paolo Piccaluga, Alessandro Isidori

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCytarabineMedicineInternal medicineMyeloid leukemiaChemotherapyProspective cohort studyGastroenterologyInduction chemotherapyOncologySurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Older (age ≥60 years) patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have poor outcomes and intensive induction chemotherapy is frequently unsuitable. Thus, new safe and effective therapies are urgently needed. Tosedostat, a new, orally bioavailable inhibitor of members of the M1 and M17 classes of aminopeptidases, was proven to be effective in both de novo and relapsed AML. We hypothesize that the addition of tosedostat to cytarabine may improve the response rate and remission duration over what is expected with chemotherapy or tosedostat alone. Methods: This was a phase II, prospective, multicenter study, designed according to Fleming's method. Fixing the lowest acceptable rate as 10% and the successful rate as 25%, with a significance level alpha=0.05 and a power 1-beta =0.80, the sample size was estimated in 33 patients. Thirty-three patients (median age 75 years) received Tosedostat 120 milligrams orally once daily until disease progression, coupled with intermittent low-dose cytarabine given subcutaneously at 20 milligrams twice/day for 10 days. Courses of cytarabine were repeated every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, up to 8 cycles. Global gene expression profiling (GEP, Affymetrix Human Gene 2.0 Array) was performed on purified AML blasts of 29 patients from peripheral blood or bone marrow at diagnosis before treatment initiation. Unsupervised clustering was generated using a hierarchical algorithm based on the average-linkage method. Principal component analysis (PCA) and supervised gene expression analysis was performed by using GeneSpring GX 12.0 (Agilent, USA). Results: The characteristic of enrolled patients are listed in table 1 Induction-period mortality was 12%, with 4 deaths occurring in aplasia. According to intent-to-treat, the CR rate was 48.5% (16/33 patients); 2 additional patients obtained a partial response, for an overall response rate of 54.6%. In addition, 4/33 patients remained in stable disease for a median time of 9 months (range: 4-14). Seven patients did not respond and died with progressive disease after having received a median of 2 cycles of cytarabine and 45 days of tosedostat. In responding patients, the median time to best response was 74 days (range 22-145). Responding patients (CR+PR) had a longer median overall survival than non-responders (P=0.018). Six out of 18 (33%) responding patients are still in CR after a median follow-up of 425.5 days (range 208-758); 5 additional patients are alive with stable disease. Twenty-two patients died [while in aplasia (4), in CR (1), due to resistant disease (9) or due to progressive disease (8) after a median CR duration of 192 days (87-535)]. 29 patients had GEP analysis, and a molecular signature associated with the clinical response (CR vs. no CR) was identified. By supervised analysis, 212 genes differentially expressed based on the clinical response (complete remission (CR) vs no CR) were identified (Mann-Whitney, p<0.05; fold change >2). The 212 genes differentially expressed were significantly associated with six relevant biological functions and pathways: β-catenin (βcat); TNFα signaling pathway via NFκB; ERB2; STK33/SKM (serine/threonine kinase 33 expression using the SKM cell line); inflammatory response; and epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathways. Conclusions: The tosedostat and low-dose cytarabine combo produced a CR rate superior to what expected (45.4% versus 25%), and thus met the primary endpoint of study. Further, potential biomarkers were identified by GEP. Specifically, the achievement of CR could be efficiently predicted by the gene expression patterns with an overall accuracy exceeding 90%. A validation analysis is currently being conducted on additional 14 patients in order to confirm the ability of GEP to identify potential responders to TST. The study was registered at European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EudraCT) n.2012-000334-19. Acknowledgments: CTI is gratefully acknowledged for providing Tosedostat for the patients. The study was supported in part by AIL Pesaro Onlus. Table 1. Characteristic N = 33 Median age, years (range) 75 (62-85) Median WBC count, × 109/L (range) 3.05 (0.26-24.53) Blasts, % (range) 60 (20-96) Cytogenetic risk group*, n Not evaluable 3 (9%) Intermediate Karyotype 17 (52%) Unfavourable Karyotype 13 (39%) AML, n De novo 16 (48%) Secondary, n 17 (52%) Disclosures Fanin: Novartis Farma: Speakers Bureau.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,574

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetPeptidase Inhibition and AnalysisTravaux en français237 207