MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2579077000 · doi:10.1182/blood.v114.22.3580.3580

PD-L1 Immuno-Gene Therapy Under Cell Fate Control: Persistence of Cellular Delivery Vehicle and Transgene Expression.

2009· article· en· W2579077000 sur OpenAlexaff
Shoba Amarnath, James CM Wang, Paul R. Massey, James L. Riley, Bruce L. Levine, Carl H. June, Jeffrey A. Medin, Daniel H. Fowler

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensUniversity Health NetworkOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyJurkat cellsGenetic enhancementCD19Gene deliveryT cellCell biologyTransgeneViral vectorTransfectionCell therapyEx vivoMolecular biologyFlow cytometryImmune systemIn vivoGeneStem cellImmunologyGeneticsRecombinant DNA

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3580 Poster Board III-517 Immune cell expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) represents a particularly important molecular mechanism responsible for control of auto- and allo-immunity mediated by effector memory T cells expressing PD1 receptor. As such, we have reasoned that an immuno-gene therapy approach that enables T cell expression of PD-L1 will represent a novel method of immune regulation. Advantageous features of this proposed therapy include a capacity to: (1) enforce long-term, stable expression of PD-L1; (2) build-in an independent surface marker to allow specific transduced cell enrichment; (3) utilize cellular delivery vehicles comprised of highly functional T cells that persist in vivo after adoptive transfer; and (4) incorporate an enhanced cell fate control or ‘suicide’ gene to permit in vivo control of the immuno-gene therapy. Given these considerations, we developed a recombinant lentiviral vector (LV) incorporating an EF1-α promoter that first encodes the cDNA for a fusion protein consisting of human CD19 (truncated, non-signaling) combined with mutated human TMPK that efficiently activates AZT as a pro-drug (Sato et al; Mol Therapy, 2007); then, after an IRES element, the vector encodes full-length human PD-L1. LV was made after transfection of 293T cells and then concentrated and titered. Initial experiments used Jurkat cells to optimize virus infection and to confirm co-expression of CD19 and PD-L1 by flow cytometry. In previous work, we have demonstrated that ex vivo T cell expansion in rapamycin induces an anti-apoptotic phenotype that permits enhanced in vivo T cell persistence in murine models and human-into-mouse xenogeneic transplant models. As such, we established the goal of infecting primary human CD4+ T cells manufactured using ex vivo co-stimulation (anti-CD3, anti-CD28), Th1-type polarization (inclusion of IFN-α), and exposure to high-dose rapamycin (1 μM); using a 6-day culture system and subsequent anti-CD19 column purification, >90% of resultant transduced T cells expressed PD-L1. Next, we utilized a xenogeneic transplantation model (Rag2−/−γc−/− hosts) to assess in vivo persistence of the gene-modified T cells and transgene expression (10,000 T cells transferred i.v. into each host). In vivo experiment #1 demonstrated that recipients of gene-modified T cells had increased numbers of human T cells in the spleen that co-expressed CD19 and PD-L1 relative to recipients of non-transduced but identically expanded human T cells (harvested at day 5 after adoptive transfer; 38,000 cells/spleen vs. 1000 cells/spleen, p=0.02). Such in vivo harvested T cells were secondarily co-stimulated ex vivo and propagated for an additional 5 days: co-expression of CD19 and PD-L1 persisted in ∼ 50% of T cells harvested from the gene-modified T cell cohort, and T cell numbers were maintained ex vivo (yield of CD19+PD-L1+ cells, 28,600 vs. 1500; p=0.0001). In vivo experiment #2 confirmed and extended these results. At day 21 after adoptive transfer, recipients of gene-modified T cells had increased numbers of human T cells that co-expressed CD19 and PD-L1 relative to recipients of non-transduced but identically expanded human T cells in both the spleen (2800 cells/spleen vs. 390 cells/spleen, p=0.01; n=10 per cohort) and bone marrow (71,600 cells/marrow vs. 6500 cells/marrow, p=0.0001; n=10 per cohort). Such in vivo harvested T cells at day 21 after adoptive transfer were secondarily co-stimulated ex vivo and propagated for an additional 6 days: co-expression of CD19 and PD-L1 persisted in ∼ 50% of T cells harvested from the gene-modified T cell cohort, and T cell numbers were maintained ex vivo (yield of CD19+PD-L1+ cells harvested from spleen, 71,200 vs. 1800, p=0.0008; yield of CD19+PD-L1+ cells harvested from marrow, 226,000 vs. 1400, p=0.0001). Because the rapamycin-resistant T cell vehicle utilized in these experiments manifests an anti-apoptotic phenotype that confers long-term engraftment potential, it is likely that the demonstrated durability in transgene expression relates both to the efficiency of the LV method utilized and to a T cell pro-survival function. In conclusion, the LV-mediated transfer of this novel combination of CD19/TMPK fusion protein and PD-L1 results in stable transgene expression in primary human T cells in vitro and in vivo, thereby opening an avenue to assess PD-L1 mediated immuno-gene therapy under cell fate control. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,224 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetCAR-T cell therapy research→Travaux en français237 207→