The Role of ABO Blood Group In TTP Prevalence and Disease Outcome
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 4671 TTP results from deficiency of ADAMTS13 that leads to accumulation of high molecular weight multimers (HMWM) of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and thrombosis in the microvasculature. Previous studies have shown that HMWM VWF purified from blood group O individuals were cleaved faster by ADAMTS13 compared to HMWM VWF from non-O blood group individuals. We hypothesized that blood group O patients have lower prevalence of TTP and/or less severe form of TTP. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all TTP patients treated at our institution from 1993 to 2010. The patients were identified from the review of plasmapheresis treatment records. Any patients with missing charts were excluded. The diagnosis of TTP was made on the basis of laboratory evidence of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia and neurologic and/or renal abnormalities, following exclusion of alternative diagnoses. ADAMTS13 levels were determined by collagen binding assay in select patients. 94 patients were included in the study. The patient characteristics were as follows: 32 males versus 62 females, mean age 45.4 years. 37/94 (39%) patients had ADAMTS13 analyzed with the following results: low ADAMTS13 (21 patients), normal ADAMTS13 (15 patients), equivocal 1. Presentation laboratory investigations were available for 91 patients and were as follows: median platelet count 16×109/L (min 3, max 274) and median hemoglobin 89 g/L (min 48, max 152). At presentation, 19/91 (20.9%) patients had fever (>38C) and 43/91 (47%) had neurological abnormalities (ranging in severity from headache to seizures and decreased level of consciousness). The blood group distribution in the TTP cohort was blood group O 41 patients, non-O 48 patients, data not available 5 patients. All patients received plasmapheresis with cryosupernatant plasma (CSP) or FFP, with some also receiving steroids and other therapies. The patients received a median of 12 (min 1, max 67) plasmapheresis treatments. Overall mortality rate was 22%. The other outcomes were as follows: death at 6 months follow-up 19%; death at 6 months or relapse 20%, death during treatment or permanent dialysis or permanent neurological disability 21%. The prevalence of blood group O versus non-O in our TTP cohort (n=89) was not significantly different from the prevalence of blood group O versus non-O in the general patient population of our institution over 2000–2010 (n=24,852; p=0.71). As illustrated below, in univariate analysis, TTP patients with blood group O did not have significantly different outcomes compared to TTP patients with non-O group blood. Outcomes Group O patients Non-group O patients p-values Death at 6 months 6/41 11/48 0.32 Death at 6 months or relapse 13/41 20/48 0.16 Death during treatment/permanent disability/permanent dialysis dependence 7/41 10/48 0.38 Conclusion: The prevalence of blood group O vs. non-O was not significantly different between the TTP cohort and our general patient population. Although there appeared to be a trend towards worse outcomes in patients with non-O blood group, there were no statistically significant differences in the outcomes in the patients with blood group O vs. non-O. The outcomes assessed in our study included death at 6 months, death at 6 months or relapse, and death during treatment/permanent neurological disability/permanent dialysis dependence. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».