MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Role of ABO Blood Group In TTP Prevalence and Disease Outcome

2010· article· en· W2581816360 on OpenAlexaff
Katerina Pavenski, Jordana Boro, John Freedman, Marie Garvey, Jerome Teitel, Lisa K. Hicks

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsADAMTS13MedicineABO blood group systemInternal medicineMicroangiopathic hemolytic anemiaPlasmapheresisGastroenterologyVon Willebrand factorThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraSurgeryPediatricsPlateletImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 4671 TTP results from deficiency of ADAMTS13 that leads to accumulation of high molecular weight multimers (HMWM) of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and thrombosis in the microvasculature. Previous studies have shown that HMWM VWF purified from blood group O individuals were cleaved faster by ADAMTS13 compared to HMWM VWF from non-O blood group individuals. We hypothesized that blood group O patients have lower prevalence of TTP and/or less severe form of TTP. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all TTP patients treated at our institution from 1993 to 2010. The patients were identified from the review of plasmapheresis treatment records. Any patients with missing charts were excluded. The diagnosis of TTP was made on the basis of laboratory evidence of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia and neurologic and/or renal abnormalities, following exclusion of alternative diagnoses. ADAMTS13 levels were determined by collagen binding assay in select patients. 94 patients were included in the study. The patient characteristics were as follows: 32 males versus 62 females, mean age 45.4 years. 37/94 (39%) patients had ADAMTS13 analyzed with the following results: low ADAMTS13 (21 patients), normal ADAMTS13 (15 patients), equivocal 1. Presentation laboratory investigations were available for 91 patients and were as follows: median platelet count 16×109/L (min 3, max 274) and median hemoglobin 89 g/L (min 48, max 152). At presentation, 19/91 (20.9%) patients had fever (>38C) and 43/91 (47%) had neurological abnormalities (ranging in severity from headache to seizures and decreased level of consciousness). The blood group distribution in the TTP cohort was blood group O 41 patients, non-O 48 patients, data not available 5 patients. All patients received plasmapheresis with cryosupernatant plasma (CSP) or FFP, with some also receiving steroids and other therapies. The patients received a median of 12 (min 1, max 67) plasmapheresis treatments. Overall mortality rate was 22%. The other outcomes were as follows: death at 6 months follow-up 19%; death at 6 months or relapse 20%, death during treatment or permanent dialysis or permanent neurological disability 21%. The prevalence of blood group O versus non-O in our TTP cohort (n=89) was not significantly different from the prevalence of blood group O versus non-O in the general patient population of our institution over 2000–2010 (n=24,852; p=0.71). As illustrated below, in univariate analysis, TTP patients with blood group O did not have significantly different outcomes compared to TTP patients with non-O group blood. Outcomes Group O patients Non-group O patients p-values Death at 6 months 6/41 11/48 0.32 Death at 6 months or relapse 13/41 20/48 0.16 Death during treatment/permanent disability/permanent dialysis dependence 7/41 10/48 0.38 Conclusion: The prevalence of blood group O vs. non-O was not significantly different between the TTP cohort and our general patient population. Although there appeared to be a trend towards worse outcomes in patients with non-O blood group, there were no statistically significant differences in the outcomes in the patients with blood group O vs. non-O. The outcomes assessed in our study included death at 6 months, death at 6 months or relapse, and death during treatment/permanent neurological disability/permanent dialysis dependence. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207