MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2582501313 · doi:10.1353/cri.2014.0035

The Politics of Law and Stability in China ed. by Susan Trevaskes et al.

2014· article· en· W2582501313 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaobing Li

Notice bibliographique

RevueChina review international · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChinaPoliticsPolitical scienceLawSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Politics of Law and Stability in China ed. by Susan Trevaskes et al. Xiaobing Li (bio) Susan Trevaskes, Elisa Nesossi, Flora Sapio, and Sara Biddulph, editors. The Politics of Law and Stability in China. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014. xii, 290 pp. Hardcover $130.00, isbn 978-1-78347-386-1. Since Chinese leaders launched the reform movement in 1978, the People's Republic of China (PRC) has experienced a tremendous wave of change. The shifting nature of the ongoing reform, however, is plagued by contradiction and the clash of law and power. The contemporary Chinese legal system in which the judiciary is partly under the control of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), has been labeled as the rule by law. In the PRC, the CCP uses the law to rule, but its discretionary power is not subject to the law. Susan Trevaskes, Elisa Nesossi, Flora Sapio, and Sara Biddulph explain in their edited book that because the CCP has always been the ruling party in the PRC, the judiciary has been the knife hilt of the Party. By claiming to make the law above everything and in the meantime requiring the judiciary to be its enforcer, the CCP is surely facing a self-made contradiction. This collection of thirteen essays offers a comprehensive [End Page 295] assessment of the Chinese legal institution and an insightful interpretation of how the system made some improvements through the legal reforms in the 2000s–2010s. The co-editors have brought together a group of prominent experts from China, Hong Kong, the United States, Australia, Canada, and Europe for their effort to provide a better understanding of the progress and problems of legal reform in China. This book collects essays from the leading social science scholars, legal experts, policy analysts, and political strategists, and examines legal issues, including identifying civil rights concerns, analyzing court corruption, and exposing factors behind law enforcement and convictions. The authors address these important topics from a new perspective through a cooperative interdisciplinary methodology among Chinese-Western scholars interested in the subject. Any legal professionals, political science scholars, social scientists in China and Asian Studies, and scholars in Chinese criminal law and criminal justice will find the volume's previously unknown cases to be of great interest and will appreciate the discussion of important questions not raised before. The chapter authors and co-authors make a significant contribution through multifaceted components from different fields such as political science, criminal justice, law, sociology, economics, and history. They introduce and explore the theory and practice of policy patterns, the political establishment, social institutions, and the legal system by identifying key problems in Chinese government and society contained within the larger framework of the international sphere. They point out that "Uneven distribution of wealth, unequal access to justice, and corruption—entrenched throughout a political system characterized by weak oversight mechanisms—have inspired widespread discontent. Many increasingly feel that their health, property and wages are no longer adequately protected by the legal system or government" (p. 5). The twelve essays are organized into three parts. The first part of the collection, "Managing Disputes," includes three chapters, exploring the politics-law-stability nexus in relation to three types of disputes: labor, land, and environmental. In the first chapter, Sara Biddulph focuses on labor disputes which the party-state "sees as a serious threat to social and political stability" (p. 8). Her study shows that low wages and work insecurity remain the major concerns of Chinese workers. Xin He examines "hard-nail household" disputes to reveal the process of legal mediation in land-taking cases as a relatively new form of judicial activism aimed to prevent unrest and preserve stability. The chapter confirms that "Concern for social stability is widely seen to play an important role in the operation of the nation's courts" (p. 43). In the third chapter, Zhang Wanhong and Ding Peng illustrate how judicial and governmental activism has become prominent in rural environmental disputes over water use. Their co-authored chapter concludes: "the only way forward to build and maintain a stable Chinese society is to protect [End Page 296] and realize people's rights with an effective...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,927
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,911

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,301 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChina review internationalMême sujetChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceTravaux en français237 207