MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2582501313 · doi:10.1353/cri.2014.0035

The Politics of Law and Stability in China ed. by Susan Trevaskes et al.

2014· article· en· W2582501313 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaobing Li

Bibliographic record

VenueChina review international · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaPoliticsPolitical scienceLawSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Politics of Law and Stability in China ed. by Susan Trevaskes et al. Xiaobing Li (bio) Susan Trevaskes, Elisa Nesossi, Flora Sapio, and Sara Biddulph, editors. The Politics of Law and Stability in China. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014. xii, 290 pp. Hardcover $130.00, isbn 978-1-78347-386-1. Since Chinese leaders launched the reform movement in 1978, the People's Republic of China (PRC) has experienced a tremendous wave of change. The shifting nature of the ongoing reform, however, is plagued by contradiction and the clash of law and power. The contemporary Chinese legal system in which the judiciary is partly under the control of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), has been labeled as the rule by law. In the PRC, the CCP uses the law to rule, but its discretionary power is not subject to the law. Susan Trevaskes, Elisa Nesossi, Flora Sapio, and Sara Biddulph explain in their edited book that because the CCP has always been the ruling party in the PRC, the judiciary has been the knife hilt of the Party. By claiming to make the law above everything and in the meantime requiring the judiciary to be its enforcer, the CCP is surely facing a self-made contradiction. This collection of thirteen essays offers a comprehensive [End Page 295] assessment of the Chinese legal institution and an insightful interpretation of how the system made some improvements through the legal reforms in the 2000s–2010s. The co-editors have brought together a group of prominent experts from China, Hong Kong, the United States, Australia, Canada, and Europe for their effort to provide a better understanding of the progress and problems of legal reform in China. This book collects essays from the leading social science scholars, legal experts, policy analysts, and political strategists, and examines legal issues, including identifying civil rights concerns, analyzing court corruption, and exposing factors behind law enforcement and convictions. The authors address these important topics from a new perspective through a cooperative interdisciplinary methodology among Chinese-Western scholars interested in the subject. Any legal professionals, political science scholars, social scientists in China and Asian Studies, and scholars in Chinese criminal law and criminal justice will find the volume's previously unknown cases to be of great interest and will appreciate the discussion of important questions not raised before. The chapter authors and co-authors make a significant contribution through multifaceted components from different fields such as political science, criminal justice, law, sociology, economics, and history. They introduce and explore the theory and practice of policy patterns, the political establishment, social institutions, and the legal system by identifying key problems in Chinese government and society contained within the larger framework of the international sphere. They point out that "Uneven distribution of wealth, unequal access to justice, and corruption—entrenched throughout a political system characterized by weak oversight mechanisms—have inspired widespread discontent. Many increasingly feel that their health, property and wages are no longer adequately protected by the legal system or government" (p. 5). The twelve essays are organized into three parts. The first part of the collection, "Managing Disputes," includes three chapters, exploring the politics-law-stability nexus in relation to three types of disputes: labor, land, and environmental. In the first chapter, Sara Biddulph focuses on labor disputes which the party-state "sees as a serious threat to social and political stability" (p. 8). Her study shows that low wages and work insecurity remain the major concerns of Chinese workers. Xin He examines "hard-nail household" disputes to reveal the process of legal mediation in land-taking cases as a relatively new form of judicial activism aimed to prevent unrest and preserve stability. The chapter confirms that "Concern for social stability is widely seen to play an important role in the operation of the nation's courts" (p. 43). In the third chapter, Zhang Wanhong and Ding Peng illustrate how judicial and governmental activism has become prominent in rural environmental disputes over water use. Their co-authored chapter concludes: "the only way forward to build and maintain a stable Chinese society is to protect [End Page 296] and realize people's rights with an effective...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChina review internationalSame topicChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207