MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2584377337 · doi:10.1113/jp273421

Ageing brains attend a symphony with asynchronous transmitter release

2017· letter· en· W2584377337 sur OpenAlexaff
Yi Yang, Lu‐Yang Wang

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Physiology · 2017
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Établissements canadiensMental Health Research CanadaHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpiral ganglionNeuroscienceAudiologyHearing lossAuditory systemCochleaPresbycusisPsychologyAgeingPerceptionAfferentCognitionSound exposureBiologyMedicineSound (geography)AcousticsPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) affects millions of people, particularly the elderly, whose hearing capacity declines over time and who in severe cases become functionally deaf. Such a deficit negatively impacts the quality of life since speech perception and cognition can be significantly compromised. Numerous studies, in human and animal models, have shown that ageing-dependent hearing impairments can be largely accounted for by a loss or damage of hair cells in the cochlea. These cells detect sound waves with extraordinary sensitivity and convert mechanical signals to electrical and chemical impulses that can be propagated into the central auditory brain. Being the peripheral detectors of auditory information, hair cells are constantly exposed to various stimuli of noisy environments and are naturally vulnerable to deleterious levels of sound. There is also strong evidence showing morphological and functional deficits in downstream afferent contacts of the auditory nerves derived from spiral ganglion cells, which collect information from hair cells and convey it to the central auditory system. Collectively, it is believed that the peripheral impairments attenuate sound information inflow into the aged brain, and hence manifest as ARHL. However, it is largely unknown whether there are age-dependent defects along the central auditory pathways, and if so, how such defects at cellular and molecular levels contribute to the compromised capacity of ageing brains to decode the fine and complex temporal structure of sound, such as in speech and music. In this issue of The Journal of Physiology, Xie & Manis (2017) present an exciting study comparing the properties of auditory neurotransmission in mature and aged CBA/CaJ mice (2–4 vs. 16–20 months old), which did not carry any known genetic mutations of hearing loss but naturally developed ARHL, mimicking the progressive nature of the human condition (Sergeyenko et al. 2013). Indeed, Xie and Manis confirmed that when presented with standard sound clicks, these aged mice had much higher thresholds and lower amplitudes of all waves in their auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) than healthy mature mice. Given flattened waves of ABRs in vivo, one would expect that neurotransmission downstream from the auditory nerve to other central stations would be profoundly affected. Surprisingly, they discovered that in ageing mice synaptic transmission at the endbulb of Held synapse, the first synaptic contact between the auditory nerve and the globular bushy cells of the cochlear nucleus (Fig. 1), was very well preserved when the auditory nerve in brainstem slices in vitro was stimulated at low frequencies (i.e. 100 Hz). In contrast, when stimulated at high frequencies (i.e. 400 Hz), the aged synapses were unable to sustain spike- and Ca2+-dependent synchronized release of neurotransmitters from the auditory nerve as typically seen in mature synapses, leading to numerous asynchronous release events that mismatched the timing of afferent inputs. Interestingly, such a breakdown of synchrony in transmitter release could be readily rescued by either a reduction of Ca2+ entry into the nerve terminal or addition of a membrane-permeant Ca2+ chelator that buffered intra-terminal Ca2+ build-up during high frequency activity. These observations led the authors to conclude that intracellular calcium handing in the aged synapse is deficient during intense activity, being not properly buffered or effectively removed. This study has presented compelling evidence that, at a central auditory synapse in the aged mice, deficiency in intra-terminal Ca2+ homeostasis breaks down the temporal precision of neurotransmitter release. Given auditory processing is critically dependent on decoding the fine temporal structure of sound, one can infer that Ca2+ mishandling may impede the fidelity of information transfer along the auditory pathway for sound perception, and contribute to the development of ARHL. By unravelling frequency-dependent Ca2+ overload as a novel mechanism for ARHL, this study raises a new set of questions with respect to the cellular and molecular substrates leading to desynchronized transmitter release. For example, is there an age-dependent down-regulation of low-threshold potassium channels that prevent activity-dependent spike broadening and overload of Ca2+ influx in the nerve terminal (Yang et al. 2014)? Have the topographic distribution and density of voltage-gated calcium channels in the active zone been remodelled? Do the levels of endogenous Ca2+-binding proteins, sensors and/or pumps change over time? Are the absorption and release of internal Ca2+ stores altered? With emerging evidence of specific genes associated with the onset of ARHL (Potter et al. 2016), answering these questions will not only provide mechanistic insights into ARHL, but also identify molecular substrates for developing innovative strategies to rectify this pathological condition. The fact that central auditory synapses can remarkably maintain the status quo despite diminishing sensory inputs during ageing raises the promising prospect of reversing or rescuing ARHL by targeting peripheral synapses as well as the intracellular Ca2+ signalling cascade in central synapses (Müller & Barr-Gillespie 2015), ultimately rejuvenating the capacity of ageing brains to attend a symphony with synchronous neurotransmitter release. None declared. Both authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All persons designated as authors qualify for authorship, and all those who qualify for authorship are listed.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,265
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of PhysiologyMême sujetHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsTravaux en français237 207