MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2584377337 · doi:10.1113/jp273421

Ageing brains attend a symphony with asynchronous transmitter release

2017· letter· en· W2584377337 on OpenAlexaff
Yi Yang, Lu‐Yang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsMental Health Research CanadaHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpiral ganglionNeuroscienceAudiologyHearing lossAuditory systemCochleaPresbycusisPsychologyAgeingPerceptionAfferentCognitionSound exposureBiologyMedicineSound (geography)AcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) affects millions of people, particularly the elderly, whose hearing capacity declines over time and who in severe cases become functionally deaf. Such a deficit negatively impacts the quality of life since speech perception and cognition can be significantly compromised. Numerous studies, in human and animal models, have shown that ageing-dependent hearing impairments can be largely accounted for by a loss or damage of hair cells in the cochlea. These cells detect sound waves with extraordinary sensitivity and convert mechanical signals to electrical and chemical impulses that can be propagated into the central auditory brain. Being the peripheral detectors of auditory information, hair cells are constantly exposed to various stimuli of noisy environments and are naturally vulnerable to deleterious levels of sound. There is also strong evidence showing morphological and functional deficits in downstream afferent contacts of the auditory nerves derived from spiral ganglion cells, which collect information from hair cells and convey it to the central auditory system. Collectively, it is believed that the peripheral impairments attenuate sound information inflow into the aged brain, and hence manifest as ARHL. However, it is largely unknown whether there are age-dependent defects along the central auditory pathways, and if so, how such defects at cellular and molecular levels contribute to the compromised capacity of ageing brains to decode the fine and complex temporal structure of sound, such as in speech and music. In this issue of The Journal of Physiology, Xie & Manis (2017) present an exciting study comparing the properties of auditory neurotransmission in mature and aged CBA/CaJ mice (2–4 vs. 16–20 months old), which did not carry any known genetic mutations of hearing loss but naturally developed ARHL, mimicking the progressive nature of the human condition (Sergeyenko et al. 2013). Indeed, Xie and Manis confirmed that when presented with standard sound clicks, these aged mice had much higher thresholds and lower amplitudes of all waves in their auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) than healthy mature mice. Given flattened waves of ABRs in vivo, one would expect that neurotransmission downstream from the auditory nerve to other central stations would be profoundly affected. Surprisingly, they discovered that in ageing mice synaptic transmission at the endbulb of Held synapse, the first synaptic contact between the auditory nerve and the globular bushy cells of the cochlear nucleus (Fig. 1), was very well preserved when the auditory nerve in brainstem slices in vitro was stimulated at low frequencies (i.e. 100 Hz). In contrast, when stimulated at high frequencies (i.e. 400 Hz), the aged synapses were unable to sustain spike- and Ca2+-dependent synchronized release of neurotransmitters from the auditory nerve as typically seen in mature synapses, leading to numerous asynchronous release events that mismatched the timing of afferent inputs. Interestingly, such a breakdown of synchrony in transmitter release could be readily rescued by either a reduction of Ca2+ entry into the nerve terminal or addition of a membrane-permeant Ca2+ chelator that buffered intra-terminal Ca2+ build-up during high frequency activity. These observations led the authors to conclude that intracellular calcium handing in the aged synapse is deficient during intense activity, being not properly buffered or effectively removed. This study has presented compelling evidence that, at a central auditory synapse in the aged mice, deficiency in intra-terminal Ca2+ homeostasis breaks down the temporal precision of neurotransmitter release. Given auditory processing is critically dependent on decoding the fine temporal structure of sound, one can infer that Ca2+ mishandling may impede the fidelity of information transfer along the auditory pathway for sound perception, and contribute to the development of ARHL. By unravelling frequency-dependent Ca2+ overload as a novel mechanism for ARHL, this study raises a new set of questions with respect to the cellular and molecular substrates leading to desynchronized transmitter release. For example, is there an age-dependent down-regulation of low-threshold potassium channels that prevent activity-dependent spike broadening and overload of Ca2+ influx in the nerve terminal (Yang et al. 2014)? Have the topographic distribution and density of voltage-gated calcium channels in the active zone been remodelled? Do the levels of endogenous Ca2+-binding proteins, sensors and/or pumps change over time? Are the absorption and release of internal Ca2+ stores altered? With emerging evidence of specific genes associated with the onset of ARHL (Potter et al. 2016), answering these questions will not only provide mechanistic insights into ARHL, but also identify molecular substrates for developing innovative strategies to rectify this pathological condition. The fact that central auditory synapses can remarkably maintain the status quo despite diminishing sensory inputs during ageing raises the promising prospect of reversing or rescuing ARHL by targeting peripheral synapses as well as the intracellular Ca2+ signalling cascade in central synapses (Müller & Barr-Gillespie 2015), ultimately rejuvenating the capacity of ageing brains to attend a symphony with synchronous neurotransmitter release. None declared. Both authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All persons designated as authors qualify for authorship, and all those who qualify for authorship are listed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207