MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2584879725 · doi:10.47678/cjhe.v46i4.188025

Book review of "Global innovation of teaching and learning in higher education"

2017· article· en· W2584879725 sur OpenAlex
Lijuan Wang

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Higher Education · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueEducational Innovations and Challenges
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHigher educationScholarshipCompetition (biology)Context (archaeology)Scholarship of Teaching and LearningGlobalizationSociologyMathematics educationPolitical sciencePedagogyTeaching methodTeaching and learning centerPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Layne, P.C., & Lake, P. (Eds.) (2015). Global Innovation of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Transgressing Boundaries. New York and London: Springer. Pages: 368. Price: USD $129 (hardcover or paper), USD $99.00 (ebook).The purpose of this book is to examine current trends in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) and higher education, with a focus on the pedagogical strategies used by instructors worldwide for overcoming challenges in higher education. The general idea is that, in order to maximize students' learning, institutions should follow innovative policies, and instructors have to be collaborative and creative in their teaching practices, for in the present world demands and needs are growing faster than ever and challenges have become far more rigorous.The book is organized into an introduction and five parts. Part I (Chapters 2 to 6) is composed of five chapters and it calls for transforming the in higher education which adheres too much to organizational systems and structures-i.e., based on lecture-style pedagogies and unidirectional transfer of knowledge and related assessment. To be specific, Baun (Ch2) combines accelerated, intensive and immersion learning, and with two case studies points out that concentrated learning can be a feasible method for education. Layne (Ch3) examines some of the creative innovations higher education institutions make around their funding sources, structures and competition, and finds that, even within the context of economic pressures, competition and globalization, students should remain the central motivation in pedagogies, policies and infrastructures. Barnes et al. (Ch4) find that adopting an approach such as the Universal Design for Learning, which aims to facilitate learning for the maximum number of students, would benefit all students, for in such an approach, the variety of skills, cultures, needs, interests and backgrounds are all taken into consideration in learning activities. Burkill (Ch5) discusses the key pedagogic principles and reflects critically on the challenges faced by instructors and students. Nye (Ch6) focuses on stories of assessment and argues that good outcomes in the discipline depend on the inclusion of both traditional and experimental approaches.Part II (Chapters 7 to 9) is composed of three chapters on the experience of theory in solving current problems. Among the global innovations in teaching and learning introduced to readers, theory and practice-based approaches and case studies reveal researchoriented, student-driven experiences where student voices are foregrounded. Roller (Ch7) finds that if pre-service teachers participate in study abroad programs with an intentional curriculum, they are going to become better equipped to work with diverse students in their classrooms, being encouraged to reflect upon culture and pedagogy. Bartzis & Mulvihill (Ch8) find that the benefits of student teaching abroad programmes include increased self-awareness, cross-cultural understanding and the development of cultural empathy in teacher candidates. Hammonds & Oritsejafor (Ch9) argue that educators must take into account the extraordinary amount of time needed for planning, discussion, evaluation, and conceptualization before curriculum design begins.Practical experiences are then introduced in Part III (Chapters 10-13), with focus on the theme of transgressing boundaries using technology. Technology represents the most widely used means of transforming higher education and approaches to teaching and learning, under the influence of the internet. It demonstrates the range of possibilities available to transform teaching and learning in higher education. Morris & Stommel (Ch10) argue that MOOCs do not reveal anything new about education and learning, and they propose to build community in MOOCs. Kulchitsky et al. (Chn) focus on how automating and using feedback/checking of student notes support teaching and learning, and they find that the semantic coherence of student notes to instructor notes is a useful measurement tool of class performance. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,757
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,843

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,337
Écart entre enseignants0,299 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle