MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2584879725 · doi:10.47678/cjhe.v46i4.188025

Book review of "Global innovation of teaching and learning in higher education"

2017· article· en· W2584879725 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lijuan Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Higher Education · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Innovations and Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHigher educationScholarshipCompetition (biology)Context (archaeology)Scholarship of Teaching and LearningGlobalizationSociologyMathematics educationPolitical sciencePedagogyTeaching methodTeaching and learning centerPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Layne, P.C., & Lake, P. (Eds.) (2015). Global Innovation of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Transgressing Boundaries. New York and London: Springer. Pages: 368. Price: USD $129 (hardcover or paper), USD $99.00 (ebook).The purpose of this book is to examine current trends in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) and higher education, with a focus on the pedagogical strategies used by instructors worldwide for overcoming challenges in higher education. The general idea is that, in order to maximize students' learning, institutions should follow innovative policies, and instructors have to be collaborative and creative in their teaching practices, for in the present world demands and needs are growing faster than ever and challenges have become far more rigorous.The book is organized into an introduction and five parts. Part I (Chapters 2 to 6) is composed of five chapters and it calls for transforming the in higher education which adheres too much to organizational systems and structures-i.e., based on lecture-style pedagogies and unidirectional transfer of knowledge and related assessment. To be specific, Baun (Ch2) combines accelerated, intensive and immersion learning, and with two case studies points out that concentrated learning can be a feasible method for education. Layne (Ch3) examines some of the creative innovations higher education institutions make around their funding sources, structures and competition, and finds that, even within the context of economic pressures, competition and globalization, students should remain the central motivation in pedagogies, policies and infrastructures. Barnes et al. (Ch4) find that adopting an approach such as the Universal Design for Learning, which aims to facilitate learning for the maximum number of students, would benefit all students, for in such an approach, the variety of skills, cultures, needs, interests and backgrounds are all taken into consideration in learning activities. Burkill (Ch5) discusses the key pedagogic principles and reflects critically on the challenges faced by instructors and students. Nye (Ch6) focuses on stories of assessment and argues that good outcomes in the discipline depend on the inclusion of both traditional and experimental approaches.Part II (Chapters 7 to 9) is composed of three chapters on the experience of theory in solving current problems. Among the global innovations in teaching and learning introduced to readers, theory and practice-based approaches and case studies reveal researchoriented, student-driven experiences where student voices are foregrounded. Roller (Ch7) finds that if pre-service teachers participate in study abroad programs with an intentional curriculum, they are going to become better equipped to work with diverse students in their classrooms, being encouraged to reflect upon culture and pedagogy. Bartzis & Mulvihill (Ch8) find that the benefits of student teaching abroad programmes include increased self-awareness, cross-cultural understanding and the development of cultural empathy in teacher candidates. Hammonds & Oritsejafor (Ch9) argue that educators must take into account the extraordinary amount of time needed for planning, discussion, evaluation, and conceptualization before curriculum design begins.Practical experiences are then introduced in Part III (Chapters 10-13), with focus on the theme of transgressing boundaries using technology. Technology represents the most widely used means of transforming higher education and approaches to teaching and learning, under the influence of the internet. It demonstrates the range of possibilities available to transform teaching and learning in higher education. Morris & Stommel (Ch10) argue that MOOCs do not reveal anything new about education and learning, and they propose to build community in MOOCs. Kulchitsky et al. (Chn) focus on how automating and using feedback/checking of student notes support teaching and learning, and they find that the semantic coherence of student notes to instructor notes is a useful measurement tool of class performance. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Higher EducationSame topicEducational Innovations and ChallengesFrench-language works237,207