MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2586559902 · doi:10.1182/blood.v120.21.3753.3753

Blast Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Pooled Analysis of Subcutaneous Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate in Treatment-Resistant Patients

2012· article· en· W2586559902 sur OpenAlexaff
H. Jean Khoury, Jörge E. Cortes, Meir Wetzler, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Michele Baccarani, Dan Douer, Adam Craig, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Luke P. Akard

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicineNeutropeniaTolerabilityMyeloid leukemiaLeukemiaGastroenterologyAdverse effectOncologyPharmacologyImmunologyChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3753 Background Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate (“omacetaxine”) is a first-in-class cephalotaxine. Omacetaxine is a protein synthesis inhibitor that does not depend on direct binding of Bcr-Abl. Omacetaxine reduces levels of multiple oncoproteins, including Bcr-Abl, and induces apoptosis in leukemic stem cells. Omacetaxine has shown clinical activity and adequate tolerability in two phase 2, open-label, international, multicenter studies in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): the first in patients with history of T315I mutation who had failed prior imatinib and the second in patients with resistance or intolerance to ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This is a pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety data of omacetaxine in patients with CML in the blast phase (BP). Methods Data from patients with CML-BP were included from two phase 2 studies. All patients received omacetaxine 1.25 mg/m2 subcutaneously twice daily for up to 14 consecutive days every 28 days for induction and the same dosage for up to 7 days every 28 days as maintenance. The number of consecutive days of dosing could be adjusted, as clinically indicated. Recombinant growth factor support was allowed in the event of febrile neutropenia. The primary outcome measures were major hematologic response (MaHR) and major cytogenetic response (MCyR). MaHR was defined as complete hematologic response (CHR) lasting ≥4 weeks, no evidence of leukemia, or return to chronic phase. MCyR included confirmed or unconfirmed complete or partial response. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, time to disease progression, overall survival and safety. Results Forty-four patients with CML-BP (median age 53.5 years [range, 19–68]) received treatment with omacetaxine. Forty-two patients (96%) had ECOG status ≤2. All but 1 patient had prior treatment with imatinib; 5 (11%) patients received imatinib only, 20 (45%) received 2 approved TKIs (imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib), and 19 (43%) were treated with all 3 approved TKIs. Most common non-TKI agents included hydroxyurea in 18/44 (41%), anthracyclines and related agents in 17 (39%), cytarabine in 14 (32%), and interferons in 11 (25%). Mutation analysis was not performed per protocol; however, point mutations were detected in 23 patients, and 17 (74%) of these had the T315I mutation. No mutations were identified in 7 patients and 14 were not assessed for mutations. The median number of cycles of omacetaxine administered was 2 (range 1–12) with a median duration of exposure of 1.5 months (range 0–13.8). Four patients (9%) had a MaHR (3 with CHR and 1 returned to chronic phase); additional 2 patients had hematologic improvement as a best response. No patient achieved MCyR; 3 patients (7%) achieved a minimal cytogenetic response. Median duration of MaHR was 1.7 months (range 1.7–4.9 months). Median survival was 3.5 months (95% CI 2.2–4.5); in 4 patients with MaHR, median survival was not reached as of >1 year of follow-up by Kaplan-Meier analysis (95% CI 2.4 to not reached) versus 3.5 months (95% CI 2.2–3.9) in patients without MaHR (Figure). Median time to disease progression was 2.2 months (95% CI 1.5–2.9). Grade 3/4 laboratory hematologic toxicities included thrombocytopenia (43/44 patients), anemia (36/44), neutropenia (36/44), and leukopenia (29/44), with most of the thrombocytopenia and neutropenia toxicities occurring in earlier cycles and attenuating in later cycles. The most common (≥5%) grade 3/4 nonhematologic AEs were hypercalcemia and bone pain (4/44 each), followed by confusional state (3/44). The most common reasons for discontinuation were progressive disease (21 patients) and death (14 patients); 2 patients discontinued due to AEs. One patient discontinued due to transfer for stem cell transplantation (7 cycles received on study over 6.7 months). Nineteen deaths occurred on study and 19 during follow-up; disease progression was the most common cause (25/38). One death was deemed related to the study drug (sepsis). Conclusions Among heavily pretreated patients with CML-BP who had failed prior TKI therapy, omacetaxine demonstrated limited activity, although 13% of patients had hematologic improvement, 2 patients had responses with duration longer than one year. Most grade 3/4 events were hematologic; grade 3/4 nonhematologic AEs were less common. Support: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate (“omacetaxine”) is a protein synthesis inhibitor that does not depend on direct binding of Bcr-Abl. Omacetaxine has shown clinical activity in 2 studies of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), one in patients with a history of the T315I Bcr-Abl mutation and the other in patients failing at least 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Chemgenex (Teva): Consultancy, Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wetzler:BMS: Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Baccarani:Teva: Research Funding. Douer:Teva: Consultancy. Craig:Teva: Consultancy. Kantarjian:ChemGenex (Teva): Research Funding. Akard:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: Méta-analyse
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,039

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,006
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,258 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207