MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Blast Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Pooled Analysis of Subcutaneous Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate in Treatment-Resistant Patients

2012· article· en· W2586559902 on OpenAlexaff
H. Jean Khoury, Jörge E. Cortes, Meir Wetzler, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Michele Baccarani, Dan Douer, Adam Craig, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Luke P. Akard

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineNeutropeniaTolerabilityMyeloid leukemiaLeukemiaGastroenterologyAdverse effectOncologyPharmacologyImmunologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3753 Background Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate (“omacetaxine”) is a first-in-class cephalotaxine. Omacetaxine is a protein synthesis inhibitor that does not depend on direct binding of Bcr-Abl. Omacetaxine reduces levels of multiple oncoproteins, including Bcr-Abl, and induces apoptosis in leukemic stem cells. Omacetaxine has shown clinical activity and adequate tolerability in two phase 2, open-label, international, multicenter studies in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): the first in patients with history of T315I mutation who had failed prior imatinib and the second in patients with resistance or intolerance to ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This is a pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety data of omacetaxine in patients with CML in the blast phase (BP). Methods Data from patients with CML-BP were included from two phase 2 studies. All patients received omacetaxine 1.25 mg/m2 subcutaneously twice daily for up to 14 consecutive days every 28 days for induction and the same dosage for up to 7 days every 28 days as maintenance. The number of consecutive days of dosing could be adjusted, as clinically indicated. Recombinant growth factor support was allowed in the event of febrile neutropenia. The primary outcome measures were major hematologic response (MaHR) and major cytogenetic response (MCyR). MaHR was defined as complete hematologic response (CHR) lasting ≥4 weeks, no evidence of leukemia, or return to chronic phase. MCyR included confirmed or unconfirmed complete or partial response. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, time to disease progression, overall survival and safety. Results Forty-four patients with CML-BP (median age 53.5 years [range, 19–68]) received treatment with omacetaxine. Forty-two patients (96%) had ECOG status ≤2. All but 1 patient had prior treatment with imatinib; 5 (11%) patients received imatinib only, 20 (45%) received 2 approved TKIs (imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib), and 19 (43%) were treated with all 3 approved TKIs. Most common non-TKI agents included hydroxyurea in 18/44 (41%), anthracyclines and related agents in 17 (39%), cytarabine in 14 (32%), and interferons in 11 (25%). Mutation analysis was not performed per protocol; however, point mutations were detected in 23 patients, and 17 (74%) of these had the T315I mutation. No mutations were identified in 7 patients and 14 were not assessed for mutations. The median number of cycles of omacetaxine administered was 2 (range 1–12) with a median duration of exposure of 1.5 months (range 0–13.8). Four patients (9%) had a MaHR (3 with CHR and 1 returned to chronic phase); additional 2 patients had hematologic improvement as a best response. No patient achieved MCyR; 3 patients (7%) achieved a minimal cytogenetic response. Median duration of MaHR was 1.7 months (range 1.7–4.9 months). Median survival was 3.5 months (95% CI 2.2–4.5); in 4 patients with MaHR, median survival was not reached as of >1 year of follow-up by Kaplan-Meier analysis (95% CI 2.4 to not reached) versus 3.5 months (95% CI 2.2–3.9) in patients without MaHR (Figure). Median time to disease progression was 2.2 months (95% CI 1.5–2.9). Grade 3/4 laboratory hematologic toxicities included thrombocytopenia (43/44 patients), anemia (36/44), neutropenia (36/44), and leukopenia (29/44), with most of the thrombocytopenia and neutropenia toxicities occurring in earlier cycles and attenuating in later cycles. The most common (≥5%) grade 3/4 nonhematologic AEs were hypercalcemia and bone pain (4/44 each), followed by confusional state (3/44). The most common reasons for discontinuation were progressive disease (21 patients) and death (14 patients); 2 patients discontinued due to AEs. One patient discontinued due to transfer for stem cell transplantation (7 cycles received on study over 6.7 months). Nineteen deaths occurred on study and 19 during follow-up; disease progression was the most common cause (25/38). One death was deemed related to the study drug (sepsis). Conclusions Among heavily pretreated patients with CML-BP who had failed prior TKI therapy, omacetaxine demonstrated limited activity, although 13% of patients had hematologic improvement, 2 patients had responses with duration longer than one year. Most grade 3/4 events were hematologic; grade 3/4 nonhematologic AEs were less common. Support: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate (“omacetaxine”) is a protein synthesis inhibitor that does not depend on direct binding of Bcr-Abl. Omacetaxine has shown clinical activity in 2 studies of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), one in patients with a history of the T315I Bcr-Abl mutation and the other in patients failing at least 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Chemgenex (Teva): Consultancy, Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wetzler:BMS: Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Baccarani:Teva: Research Funding. Douer:Teva: Consultancy. Craig:Teva: Consultancy. Kantarjian:ChemGenex (Teva): Research Funding. Akard:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.006
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207