A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study of Subcutaneous (SC) Romiplostim in Children with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: The TPO receptor agonist romiplostim is approved for use in adults with chronic ITP. The use of romiplostim in children with ITP has been evaluated in phase 1/2 and 3 studies. In this study, children with ITP will receive open-label SC romiplostim for up to 3 years (y). Methods: Eligible children, recruited in 16 countries worldwide, had ITP for ≥6 months, ≥1 prior ITP therapy, and platelet (plt) count ≤30×109/L. Weekly SC dosing started at 1 μg/kg and was titrated in 1 μg/kg increments up to 10 μg/kg to target plt counts of 50-200×109/L. In patients in Europe, bone marrow aspirates and biopsies were obtained at baseline and after 1 or 2 y of exposure. The 1º endpoint was the % of time in the first 6 months with a plt response, with response defined as a plt count ≥50×109/L without rescue medication use in the past 4 weeks (wk). Results: As of 15 Mar 2016, 147 patients enrolled; 145 received ≥1 romiplostim dose. At baseline, median (min-max) age was 10 (2-17) y; 51% were female; 4% had prior splenectomy. Median (min-max) ITP duration was 1.9 (0.5-12.3) y and plt count was 13 (2-168)×109/L. The median (Q1, Q3) % of time with a plt response in the first 6 months patients were on study was 50% (0%, 83.3%); that of months 7-12 was 92% (33%, 100%). Over the course of the study, 80% (114/143) of patients had a plt response. The median (Q1, Q3) % of time with an increase in plt counts ≥20×109/L above baseline was 60% (25%, 84%). The median dose increased to 10 μg/kg by wk 32 (Figure). Median (min-max) treatment duration as of data cutoff was 25 (1-67) wk for a total exposure to date of 79 patient-years; 67 (46%) patients (or caregivers) self-administered romiplostim. Median (min-max) average weekly romiplostim dose was 6.1 (0.4-9.0) µg/kg. Thirty-two patients (22%) discontinued treatment for lack of efficacy (n = 17), required other therapy (n = 5), patient request (n = 4), noncompliance (n = 2), adverse event (AE) (n = 2) (interstitial lung disease unrelated to treatment in a 15 y old boy and abdominal pain, vomiting, and headache related to treatment per investigator in a 9 y old girl), administrative decision (n = 1), and investigator decision (n = 1). After wk 12, median plt counts remained ≥50×109/L (Figure). Thirty-four (23%) patients received rescue medications. The most frequently reported AEs were headache (27.6%), epistaxis (22.8%), and nasopharyngitis (23%); 15 (10.3%) patients had serious AEs (SAEs) including epistaxis (n = 4), petechiae (n = 2), decreased plt count (n = 2), and thrombocytopenia (n = 2). A case of abdominal pain was the only SAE deemed treatment-related by the investigator. Bleeding over the course of the study was seen in 52% of patients. CTCAE grade 3 bleeding was seen in 8 patients (6%) and included epistaxis (n = 5), ecchymosis (n = 2), petechiae (n = 2), and 1 case each of hematemesis, hematoma, SC hemorrhage, injection site hemorrhage, and mouth hemorrhage. No grade 4 or 5 bleeding was observed. One event of grade 2 phlebitis/thrombophlebitis in deep veins in the left arm lasting 14 days was reported in a 13 y old girl; plt counts were 40-70×109/L and the dose was 7-8 µg/kg during this time. Per investigator, this event was not serious or related to romiplostim. She was treated with antibiotics (oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and transdermal muciprocin) and continued romiplostim treatment as before. No neutralizing antibodies against romiplostim or TPO were identified. Of 30 patients with baseline bone marrow biopsies [50% female, median (min-max) age 10.5 (6-12) y, ITP duration 3.1 (0.6-11) y], all had modified Bauermeister scores of grade 0 (no reticulin) or 1 (fine fibers) and bone marrow typical for ITP. Of these 30 patients, 21 had evaluable on-study biopsies, with no increases in 2 or more grades, findings of collagen, or bone marrow abnormalities. Conclusion: In this year 1 datacut of an ongoing open-label study of romiplostim in children with ITP, the % of time in the first 6 months with a platelet response was 50%, with 80% of children having a platelet response at some point on study. The median romiplostim dose reached 10 μg/kg and there were no new safety signals. No effects of romiplostim were observed in the subset of patients with bone marrow biopsies. Future datacuts for year 2 and 3 in this study, the largest of romiplostim in children with ITP with 79 patient-years of exposure to date, will provide more information on platelet response, dose requirements, and safety. Disclosures Grainger: Baxter: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria. Bussel:Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Symphogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; BiologicTx: Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prophylix Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Protalex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Physicians Education Resource: Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Research Funding; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Momenta Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; Sysmex: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cooper:UK ITP support association: Research Funding; National Organization for Rare Disorders: Research Funding; Imperial College BRC: Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Received honoraria for speaking at educational meetings; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Received honoraria for speaking at educational meetings ; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Received honoraria for speaking at educational meetings . Tarantino:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blanchette:Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Data safety monitoring boards , Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Other: Data safety monitoring boards . Carpenter:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Eisen:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mehta:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».