MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587507882 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.869.869

A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study of Subcutaneous (SC) Romiplostim in Children with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

2016· article· en· W2587507882 on OpenAlexaff
John D. Grainger, James B. Bussel, Nichola Cooper, Michael D. Tarantino, Victor S. Blanchette, Jenny M. Despotovic, Alexey Maschan, Nancy Carpenter, Melissa Eisen, Bhakti Mehta

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRomiplostimMedicineImmune thrombocytopeniaOpen labelPediatricsAdverse effectInternal medicineThrombopoietinPlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The TPO receptor agonist romiplostim is approved for use in adults with chronic ITP. The use of romiplostim in children with ITP has been evaluated in phase 1/2 and 3 studies. In this study, children with ITP will receive open-label SC romiplostim for up to 3 years (y). Methods: Eligible children, recruited in 16 countries worldwide, had ITP for ≥6 months, ≥1 prior ITP therapy, and platelet (plt) count ≤30×109/L. Weekly SC dosing started at 1 μg/kg and was titrated in 1 μg/kg increments up to 10 μg/kg to target plt counts of 50-200×109/L. In patients in Europe, bone marrow aspirates and biopsies were obtained at baseline and after 1 or 2 y of exposure. The 1º endpoint was the % of time in the first 6 months with a plt response, with response defined as a plt count ≥50×109/L without rescue medication use in the past 4 weeks (wk). Results: As of 15 Mar 2016, 147 patients enrolled; 145 received ≥1 romiplostim dose. At baseline, median (min-max) age was 10 (2-17) y; 51% were female; 4% had prior splenectomy. Median (min-max) ITP duration was 1.9 (0.5-12.3) y and plt count was 13 (2-168)×109/L. The median (Q1, Q3) % of time with a plt response in the first 6 months patients were on study was 50% (0%, 83.3%); that of months 7-12 was 92% (33%, 100%). Over the course of the study, 80% (114/143) of patients had a plt response. The median (Q1, Q3) % of time with an increase in plt counts ≥20×109/L above baseline was 60% (25%, 84%). The median dose increased to 10 μg/kg by wk 32 (Figure). Median (min-max) treatment duration as of data cutoff was 25 (1-67) wk for a total exposure to date of 79 patient-years; 67 (46%) patients (or caregivers) self-administered romiplostim. Median (min-max) average weekly romiplostim dose was 6.1 (0.4-9.0) µg/kg. Thirty-two patients (22%) discontinued treatment for lack of efficacy (n = 17), required other therapy (n = 5), patient request (n = 4), noncompliance (n = 2), adverse event (AE) (n = 2) (interstitial lung disease unrelated to treatment in a 15 y old boy and abdominal pain, vomiting, and headache related to treatment per investigator in a 9 y old girl), administrative decision (n = 1), and investigator decision (n = 1). After wk 12, median plt counts remained ≥50×109/L (Figure). Thirty-four (23%) patients received rescue medications. The most frequently reported AEs were headache (27.6%), epistaxis (22.8%), and nasopharyngitis (23%); 15 (10.3%) patients had serious AEs (SAEs) including epistaxis (n = 4), petechiae (n = 2), decreased plt count (n = 2), and thrombocytopenia (n = 2). A case of abdominal pain was the only SAE deemed treatment-related by the investigator. Bleeding over the course of the study was seen in 52% of patients. CTCAE grade 3 bleeding was seen in 8 patients (6%) and included epistaxis (n = 5), ecchymosis (n = 2), petechiae (n = 2), and 1 case each of hematemesis, hematoma, SC hemorrhage, injection site hemorrhage, and mouth hemorrhage. No grade 4 or 5 bleeding was observed. One event of grade 2 phlebitis/thrombophlebitis in deep veins in the left arm lasting 14 days was reported in a 13 y old girl; plt counts were 40-70×109/L and the dose was 7-8 µg/kg during this time. Per investigator, this event was not serious or related to romiplostim. She was treated with antibiotics (oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and transdermal muciprocin) and continued romiplostim treatment as before. No neutralizing antibodies against romiplostim or TPO were identified. Of 30 patients with baseline bone marrow biopsies [50% female, median (min-max) age 10.5 (6-12) y, ITP duration 3.1 (0.6-11) y], all had modified Bauermeister scores of grade 0 (no reticulin) or 1 (fine fibers) and bone marrow typical for ITP. Of these 30 patients, 21 had evaluable on-study biopsies, with no increases in 2 or more grades, findings of collagen, or bone marrow abnormalities. Conclusion: In this year 1 datacut of an ongoing open-label study of romiplostim in children with ITP, the % of time in the first 6 months with a platelet response was 50%, with 80% of children having a platelet response at some point on study. The median romiplostim dose reached 10 μg/kg and there were no new safety signals. No effects of romiplostim were observed in the subset of patients with bone marrow biopsies. Future datacuts for year 2 and 3 in this study, the largest of romiplostim in children with ITP with 79 patient-years of exposure to date, will provide more information on platelet response, dose requirements, and safety. Disclosures Grainger: Baxter: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria. Bussel:Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Symphogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; BiologicTx: Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prophylix Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Protalex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Physicians Education Resource: Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Research Funding; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Momenta Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; Sysmex: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cooper:UK ITP support association: Research Funding; National Organization for Rare Disorders: Research Funding; Imperial College BRC: Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Received honoraria for speaking at educational meetings; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Received honoraria for speaking at educational meetings ; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Received honoraria for speaking at educational meetings . Tarantino:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blanchette:Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Data safety monitoring boards , Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Other: Data safety monitoring boards . Carpenter:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Eisen:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mehta:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207