MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2587854149 · doi:10.4103/0028-3886.198198

Novel SCN8A mutation in a girl with refractory seizures and autistic features

2017· letter· en· W2587854149 sur OpenAlexaff
Puneet Jain

Notice bibliographique

RevueNeurology India · 2017
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueCongenital heart defects research
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineGirlRefractory (planetary science)Autistic spectrumMutationPediatricsAutismNeuroscienceGeneticsPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sir, A 4-year-old girl presented with speech delay and refractory seizures. She had no adverse perinatal events, had normal motor milestones, and could speak only a few bisyllables. She had seizures since 4 months of age. Initially, she had generalized tonic–clonic seizures (2–3 episodes/week) and required multiple anticonvulsant drugs (phenytoin, valproate, lamotrigine, clobazam, and levetiracetam). After 14 months of age, she experienced nocturnal tonic seizures (2–3 times/week) and atypical absences (2–3/day), which continued until her admission to our hospital. The seizures were only occasionally associated with fever. In addition to having seizures, she had autistic features (Childhood Autism Rating Scale score of 32). Her physical examination was unremarkable. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was normal. Interictal electroencephalogram (EEG) showed a slow background activity with right frontopolar spike-wave discharges. Karyotype, array comparative genomic hybridization, plasma acylcarnitine profile, and urine organic acids were normal. Next generation sequencing for epilepsy genes [Table 1] revealed a novel pathogenic heterozygous missense mutation (c.4214C>A; p. Ala1405Asp) in the exon 22 of the SCN8A gene. Both the parents were negative for this variant. She was again started on phenytoin with resolution of tonic seizures, persistence of atypical absences, and appearance of daily head-drops. She was started on modified Atkins diet. However, it had to be stopped after 25 days in view of poor compliance and oral acceptance by the child. Behavioural therapy was initiated and genetic counselling was done.Table 1: Next Generation Sequencing for epilepsy gene panelMutations in SCN8A, encoding one of the main voltage-gated sodium channel subunits (Nav1.6) in the brain, have been recently described in patients with severe epilepsy and the phenotype is still evolving.[1,2] Seventeen patients with de novo heterozygous mutations of SCN8A were recently reported.[2] The phenotype comprised variable intellectual disability, drug-refractory epilepsy, autistic features, and prominent motor manifestations (hypotonia, dystonia, hyperreflexia, and ataxia). The mean age at the onset of seizures was 5 months and the reported seizure types included focal, tonic, clonic, myoclonic, atypical absence seizures, epileptic spasms, and febrile seizures. Thus, the genetic testing for SCN8A should be considered in children with unclassified severe epilepsy. This may have a therapeutic implication. Four patients with a missense SCN8A mutation and epilepsy were reported to have a remarkably good response on high doses of phenytoin, and loss of seizure control when the phenytoin medication was reduced.[3] Our patient showed resolution of tonic seizures with phenytoin; however, the other seizure types were unaffected. Due to the recent advances in targeted next-generation sequencing panels for epileptic encephalopathy/epilepsy, the diagnostic yield for an underlying genetic abnormality has increased in patients with epileptic encephalopathy. The diagnostic yields have been reported to be between 10 and 48.5% in the literature for the 35 to 265 gene panels.[4] This technique has helped us to achieve a diagnosis in the present case. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,228
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNeurology IndiaMême sujetCongenital heart defects researchTravaux en français237 207