MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587854149 · doi:10.4103/0028-3886.198198

Novel SCN8A mutation in a girl with refractory seizures and autistic features

2017· letter· en· W2587854149 on OpenAlexaff
Puneet Jain

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology India · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGirlRefractory (planetary science)Autistic spectrumMutationPediatricsAutismNeuroscienceGeneticsPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir, A 4-year-old girl presented with speech delay and refractory seizures. She had no adverse perinatal events, had normal motor milestones, and could speak only a few bisyllables. She had seizures since 4 months of age. Initially, she had generalized tonic–clonic seizures (2–3 episodes/week) and required multiple anticonvulsant drugs (phenytoin, valproate, lamotrigine, clobazam, and levetiracetam). After 14 months of age, she experienced nocturnal tonic seizures (2–3 times/week) and atypical absences (2–3/day), which continued until her admission to our hospital. The seizures were only occasionally associated with fever. In addition to having seizures, she had autistic features (Childhood Autism Rating Scale score of 32). Her physical examination was unremarkable. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was normal. Interictal electroencephalogram (EEG) showed a slow background activity with right frontopolar spike-wave discharges. Karyotype, array comparative genomic hybridization, plasma acylcarnitine profile, and urine organic acids were normal. Next generation sequencing for epilepsy genes [Table 1] revealed a novel pathogenic heterozygous missense mutation (c.4214C>A; p. Ala1405Asp) in the exon 22 of the SCN8A gene. Both the parents were negative for this variant. She was again started on phenytoin with resolution of tonic seizures, persistence of atypical absences, and appearance of daily head-drops. She was started on modified Atkins diet. However, it had to be stopped after 25 days in view of poor compliance and oral acceptance by the child. Behavioural therapy was initiated and genetic counselling was done.Table 1: Next Generation Sequencing for epilepsy gene panelMutations in SCN8A, encoding one of the main voltage-gated sodium channel subunits (Nav1.6) in the brain, have been recently described in patients with severe epilepsy and the phenotype is still evolving.[1,2] Seventeen patients with de novo heterozygous mutations of SCN8A were recently reported.[2] The phenotype comprised variable intellectual disability, drug-refractory epilepsy, autistic features, and prominent motor manifestations (hypotonia, dystonia, hyperreflexia, and ataxia). The mean age at the onset of seizures was 5 months and the reported seizure types included focal, tonic, clonic, myoclonic, atypical absence seizures, epileptic spasms, and febrile seizures. Thus, the genetic testing for SCN8A should be considered in children with unclassified severe epilepsy. This may have a therapeutic implication. Four patients with a missense SCN8A mutation and epilepsy were reported to have a remarkably good response on high doses of phenytoin, and loss of seizure control when the phenytoin medication was reduced.[3] Our patient showed resolution of tonic seizures with phenytoin; however, the other seizure types were unaffected. Due to the recent advances in targeted next-generation sequencing panels for epileptic encephalopathy/epilepsy, the diagnostic yield for an underlying genetic abnormality has increased in patients with epileptic encephalopathy. The diagnostic yields have been reported to be between 10 and 48.5% in the literature for the 35 to 265 gene panels.[4] This technique has helped us to achieve a diagnosis in the present case. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology IndiaSame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207