MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2588707314 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.3467.3467

Safety and Efficacy of Long-Term Open-Label Dosing of Subcutaneous (SC) Romiplostim in Pediatric Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

2015· article· en· W2588707314 sur OpenAlexaff
Michael D. Tarantino, James B. Bussel, Victor S. Blanchette, Jenny M. Despotovic, Carolyn M. Bennett, Ashok Raj, Bronwyn Williams, Donald Beam, Jaime Morales, Melissa J. Rose, Kun Nie, Melissa Eisen

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRomiplostimMedicineDosingAdverse effectSplenectomyPlaceboInternal medicineClinical endpointIncidence (geometry)PediatricsSurgeryThrombopoietinClinical trial

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Chronic ITP in children is an autoimmune disorder characterized by increased platelet destruction and suboptimal platelet production. Pediatric patients with chronic ITP that completed a romiplostim phase 1/2 or phase 3 study could enroll in this open-label long-term extension; 5.2 years of data are reported. Methods: All patients received SC romiplostim once weekly. The initial dose was the final dose from the parent study or 1 µg/kg (for patients previously receiving placebo or who had not received romiplostim for >24 weeks), adjusted from 1-10 µg/kg to target platelet counts of 50-200×109/L. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was the 1° endpoint. If approved by investigators, patients who maintained platelet counts ≥50×109/L for ≥4 consecutive weeks at a stable dose could subsequently administer doses by self or caregiver. Patients who turned 18 years of age could remain on study. Results: A total of 66 patients (phase 1/2, n=12; phase 3, n=54) entered the extension; 65 received romiplostim for ≤269 weeks (5.2 years); 1 patient withdrew consent before treatment. At baseline, median (range) age was 11 (3-18) years; 56% were female; 61% were white, 14% African American, and 14% Hispanic/Latino; 9.1% had prior splenectomy. Median (range) treatment duration was 57.9 (1-269) weeks; median number of doses was 53.0 (1-268). Median (range) average weekly romiplostim dose was 5.5 (0.1-10.0) µg/kg, including escalation to stable dose, median maximum dose was 8.0 (1.0-10.0) µg/kg, and median most frequent dose was 6.0 (0-10) µg/kg. The median dose fell from 6 to 1 µg/kg; after ~week 140 (n≤9), the median dose fluctuated (Fig 1). Thirteen patients discontinued treatment: consent withdrawn (n=6), noncompliance (2), administrative decision (2), nonresponse (2), and per protocol (1). Fifty-two (79%) patients continued in the study; none withdrew due to AEs. After the first study week median platelet counts remained >50×109/L (Fig 2); for 15 patients (23%), the first study week was the first week receiving romiplostim (ie, previously received placebo). Fifty-six (86%) patients (or caregivers) self-administered romiplostim. Twenty-one (32%) patients received rescue medications on 63 occasions (for low platelet counts [n=35], bleeding/bruising [17], pre- or post-procedure [9], and other [2]), including IVIG (n=10), prednisone (9), aminocaproic acid (3), tranexamic acid (2), methylprednisolone (2), and platelet transfusion (1). Patients required rescue treatment during the first 3 months (27/63 instances), >3-6 months (9), >6-9 months (6), >9-12 months (7), and after 1 year (14) in the extension. Five previous placebo recipients received rescue medication, mostly during the first 3 months (10/14 instances). Three patients achieved remission (platelet counts ≥50×109/L for 24 weeks with no ITP treatments): 1) 9-year-old boy with ITP for 9 years, after 4.3 years of romiplostim, entered remission for the last 2.1 years as of this datacut; 2) 13-year-old boy with ITP for 8.5 years, after 3.3 years of romiplostim, entered remission for the last 1.1 years; and 3) 17-year-old girl with ITP for 8.2 years, after 5.9 years of romiplostim, entered remission for the last 44 weeks. Thirty-four serious AEs occurred in 14 patients, including pyrexia (n=3), epistaxis (2), and thrombocytopenia (2); 3 were deemed treatment-related (anemia, epistaxis, and thrombocytopenia), and none led to discontinuation of romiplostim. Five patients had life-threatening AEs, including thrombocytopenia (n=2) and infection, decreased platelet counts, and subcutaneous abscess (1 each); none were fatal or deemed treatment-related. Bleeding AEs occurred in 47 patients; 3 were deemed treatment-related by the investigator (gingival bleeding, petechiae, and epistaxis). Bleeding AEs occurring in ≥4 patients included contusion (n=25), epistaxis (21), petechiae (16), gingival bleeding (9), mouth hemorrhage (6), ecchymosis (5), and hemorrhage, injection-site bruising, and purpura (4 each). No thrombotic events were reported. There were no peripheral blood abnormalities suggestive of malignancy to warrant a bone marrow examination in any patient. There was no development of anti-TPO or anti-romiplostim antibodies. Conclusion: In this ongoing open-label extension of children with chronic ITP, romiplostim for ≤5.2 years maintained platelet counts with a safety profile similar to that seen in past studies. Disclosures Tarantino: BPL: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cangene: Research Funding; UptoDate, Inc.: Patents & Royalties: royalties. Off Label Use: Romiplostim is indicated for use in adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenia who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy. The use of romiplostim in children with ITP is investigational.. Bussel:Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sysmex: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; IgG of America: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cangene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen, Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Blanchette:Baxter Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Bayer Healthcare: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Morales:CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nie:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Other: Stockholder. Eisen:Amgen Inc: Employment, Other: stock ownership.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207