MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2588781659 · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000001306

Predisposing factors, accompanying diseases and complications of hypertension

2017· article· en· W2588781659 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alberto Zanchetti

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Hypertension · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesPennsylvania State University
Mots-clésMedicineDialysisHeart failureAtrial fibrillationInternal medicineStroke (engine)Blood pressureIntensive care medicineCohortCardiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Among the variety of topics that, as usual, are investigated in articles published in the Journal of Hypertension, a number of studies appearing in the current issue are focused on conditions that are considered, in turn, as predisposing to or accompanying hypertension or as complications of hypertension and may raise problems for the management of high blood pressure (BP). The issue opens with a consensus document jointly prepared by Working Groups of the European Renal Association – European Dialysis and Transplant Association and of the European Society of Hypertension (Sarafidis et al., pp. 657–676) offering the renal physician practical recommendations how to manage hypertension in dialysis patients, an area presenting particular difficulties, starting from the choice of which BP should be used to guide treatment (predialysis, postdialysis and home BP in the interdialytic period). In addition to renal failure, heart failure is another ominous complication of hypertension: Ravassa et al. (pp. 853–861) have investigated myocardial fibrosis phenotypes with distinct clinical outcome in hypertensive patients with heart failure and found that concurrence of serum markers of excessive collagen cross-linking and deposition is associated with poor outcome. Borghi et al. (pp. 689–695) devote a review to the relationship between hypertension, atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke, discussing the impact of hypertension on the choice of the most appropriate anticoagulation treatment among vitamin K antagonists and the new oral anticoagulation compounds. Among conditions possibly complicating hypertension, Rim et al. (pp. 729–736) have retrospectively examined a very large propensity-score matched cohort from the Korean National Health Insurance Service National database and report that patients diagnosed with hypertension were more likely to experience subsequent open-angle glaucoma than the comparison group without hypertension. In an accompanying commentary, Wiley (pp. 713–714) highlights the value of linking nationwide databases of health screening with insurance claims databases to better estimate the effects of exposure to risk factors. Conditions influencing the course of hypertension have been investigated in other studies. Lorbeer et al. (pp. 737–744), in the context of the KORA FF4 survey in Germany, find that liver fat content, as determined by MRI, is associated with SBP and DBP and with hypertension in patients from the general population without history of cardiovascular disease. In commenting these observations, Perseghin et al. (pp. 715–717) remark that although an independent pathogenic link between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and BP remains to be fully proven, the finding of a robust correlation of BP with fatty liver even within the range of normal BP emphasizes the need to put more efforts in identifying patients with NAFLD to stratify both their cardiovascular and hepatic risks. In another study on a healthy population with a high proportion of obesity, Lambert et al. (pp. 745–752) find that serum uric acid is associated with alterations in metabolic profile, end-organ damage and sympathetic activity, indicating the potential value of uric acid as marker of early cardiovascular disease development. Prospectively following up a general population sample (Penn State Adult Cohort) for about 15 years, Fernandez-Mendoza et al. (pp. 830–836) report that the risk of mortality associated with hypertension increases in a dose–response manner as a function of shorter sleep duration and suggest that short sleep in hypertensive individuals may be a marker of central autonomic dysfunction. A group of articles is focused on diagnostic and therapeutic decisions based on BP measurement. Because guidelines differ in their recommendations about the numbers of consecutive BP measurements to be taken or to be considered for diagnosing hypertension, Veloudi et al. (pp. 753–760) have re-examined data from 20 716 individuals from a general population and report that using Canadian guidelines criteria leads to some reclassification from normal SBP to hypertension, whereas British guidelines criteria result in a marked reclassification from hypertension to normotension. Three articles approach the debated problem of treating or not treating individuals with white-coat hypertension. In his editorial, Myers (pp. 707–709) underlines the arguments against initiating antihypertensive treatment and adding a ‘hypertension’ label to these individuals. On the other hand, Mancia (pp. 710–712) summarizes available evidence that white-coat hypertension is not a clinically innocent phenomenon to be disregarded when diagnosed and supports his arguments with the results of another article in this issue of the Journal, a meta-analysis of prospective studies showing that untreated white-coat hypertensive patients had a higher risk of cardiovascular events and total mortality than normotensive individuals, whereas in treated white-coat hypertension neither the risk of cardiovascular events nor mortality was increased (Huang et al., pp. 677–688). In absence of a specific randomized study, the dilemma about treating white-coat hypertension will remain unresolved. A number of aspects of antihypertensive treatment have been investigated in a set of other studies published in this issue. Shi et al. (pp. 696–706) have surveyed and meta-analyzed the BP effects of transcendental and nontranscendental meditation, reporting a small BP reduction with nontranscendental meditation. De Souza et al. (pp. 837–844) have observed a reduction in urinary aldosterone excretion in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea and resistant hypertension receiving continuous positive airway pressure treatment. J.-G. Wang et al. (pp. 877–885) present the results of a randomized study comparing treatment with sacubitril–valsartan as add-on therapy to amlodipine with amlodipine alone, finding significantly lower ambulatory BP values in the group receiving the combination. Commenting these data in an accompanying editorial, Burnier (pp. 726–728) underlines more studies with this interesting drug combination should be conducted in specific populations of hypertensive patients, such as elderly patients or patients with diabetes. From an analysis of data from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, Tedla et al. (pp. 862–869) report a lesser progression in arterial stiffness in treated hypertensive patients with controlled BP values, but slower progression occurred only in absence of diabetes and in individuals younger than 70 years. In an editorial commenting these data, Kollias et al. (pp. 721–725) remark that reduction of arterial stiffness progression is a difficult task, and to be successful intervention is needed ‘not too late and not too little’. By examining the National Acute Stroke Israeli registry, Koton et al. (pp. 870–876) report that patients under treatment with beta-blockers, either alone or in combination, at the time of an acute ischemic stroke had the same risk of stroke severity and poor outcomes as patients treated with other drug classes. A cost-effectiveness study from China suggests that the association of nitrendipine with hydrochlorothiazide allows more reasonable and efficient allocation of limited resources than the association of nitrendipine with metoprolol (Z. Wang et al., pp. 886–892). Ricci et al. (pp. 776–783) have examined data from the large Malmö Preventive Project, finding that hospital admissions due to syncope and orthostatic hypotension occur in about 3% of older individuals and increase with age and comorbidities. Syncope-related admissions predict higher all-cause mortality, whereas orthostatic hypotension-related admissions herald increased cardiovascular mortality. In a treated elderly hypertensive population in Australia, pet ownership was found associated with an improved cardiovascular disease survival (Chowdhury et al., pp. 769–775). In an accompanying commentary, Avolio et al. (pp. 718–720) enlarge the information to other medical conditions and ages, in which pet ownership appears to exert beneficial effects. Different aspects of the pathophysiology of hypertension and cardiovascular disease are approached by other articles. Bai et al. (pp. 784–797) report that shear stress-induced upregulation of the GTPCH/BH4 pathway ameliorates hypertension-related decline in the endothelial repair capacity of endothelial progenitor cells; Mao et al. (pp. 798–809) publish experimental evidence favoring a crucial role of acetylated cyclophylin A in the abnormal occurrence of autophagy and subsequent pulmonary vascular angiogenesis; Mo et al. (pp. 810–821) have investigated the potential effects of fat mass and obesity protein in modulating cholesterol deposition in macrophage foam cells and found that it exerts antiatherosclerotic properties in Apo E−/− mice; McMullan et al. (pp. 822–829) have performed a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation on the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) in humans, but found no effect of correcting vitamin D deficiency on RAS activity or BP; van Twist et al. (pp. 845–852) report that renal blood flow is significantly higher in fibromuscular dysplasia than in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis; and White et al. (pp. 761–768) have used ambulatory BP monitoring to show that the melanocortin receptor agonist, bremelanotide (developed to treat female sexual dysfunction), induces small, transient increases in BP, accompanied by reduction in heart rate. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,070
Tête enseignante GPT0,293
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Hypertension→Même sujetChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes→Travaux en français237 207→