MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2588781659 · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000001306

Predisposing factors, accompanying diseases and complications of hypertension

2017· article· en· W2588781659 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alberto Zanchetti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPennsylvania State University
KeywordsMedicineDialysisHeart failureAtrial fibrillationInternal medicineStroke (engine)Blood pressureIntensive care medicineCohortCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among the variety of topics that, as usual, are investigated in articles published in the Journal of Hypertension, a number of studies appearing in the current issue are focused on conditions that are considered, in turn, as predisposing to or accompanying hypertension or as complications of hypertension and may raise problems for the management of high blood pressure (BP). The issue opens with a consensus document jointly prepared by Working Groups of the European Renal Association – European Dialysis and Transplant Association and of the European Society of Hypertension (Sarafidis et al., pp. 657–676) offering the renal physician practical recommendations how to manage hypertension in dialysis patients, an area presenting particular difficulties, starting from the choice of which BP should be used to guide treatment (predialysis, postdialysis and home BP in the interdialytic period). In addition to renal failure, heart failure is another ominous complication of hypertension: Ravassa et al. (pp. 853–861) have investigated myocardial fibrosis phenotypes with distinct clinical outcome in hypertensive patients with heart failure and found that concurrence of serum markers of excessive collagen cross-linking and deposition is associated with poor outcome. Borghi et al. (pp. 689–695) devote a review to the relationship between hypertension, atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke, discussing the impact of hypertension on the choice of the most appropriate anticoagulation treatment among vitamin K antagonists and the new oral anticoagulation compounds. Among conditions possibly complicating hypertension, Rim et al. (pp. 729–736) have retrospectively examined a very large propensity-score matched cohort from the Korean National Health Insurance Service National database and report that patients diagnosed with hypertension were more likely to experience subsequent open-angle glaucoma than the comparison group without hypertension. In an accompanying commentary, Wiley (pp. 713–714) highlights the value of linking nationwide databases of health screening with insurance claims databases to better estimate the effects of exposure to risk factors. Conditions influencing the course of hypertension have been investigated in other studies. Lorbeer et al. (pp. 737–744), in the context of the KORA FF4 survey in Germany, find that liver fat content, as determined by MRI, is associated with SBP and DBP and with hypertension in patients from the general population without history of cardiovascular disease. In commenting these observations, Perseghin et al. (pp. 715–717) remark that although an independent pathogenic link between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and BP remains to be fully proven, the finding of a robust correlation of BP with fatty liver even within the range of normal BP emphasizes the need to put more efforts in identifying patients with NAFLD to stratify both their cardiovascular and hepatic risks. In another study on a healthy population with a high proportion of obesity, Lambert et al. (pp. 745–752) find that serum uric acid is associated with alterations in metabolic profile, end-organ damage and sympathetic activity, indicating the potential value of uric acid as marker of early cardiovascular disease development. Prospectively following up a general population sample (Penn State Adult Cohort) for about 15 years, Fernandez-Mendoza et al. (pp. 830–836) report that the risk of mortality associated with hypertension increases in a dose–response manner as a function of shorter sleep duration and suggest that short sleep in hypertensive individuals may be a marker of central autonomic dysfunction. A group of articles is focused on diagnostic and therapeutic decisions based on BP measurement. Because guidelines differ in their recommendations about the numbers of consecutive BP measurements to be taken or to be considered for diagnosing hypertension, Veloudi et al. (pp. 753–760) have re-examined data from 20 716 individuals from a general population and report that using Canadian guidelines criteria leads to some reclassification from normal SBP to hypertension, whereas British guidelines criteria result in a marked reclassification from hypertension to normotension. Three articles approach the debated problem of treating or not treating individuals with white-coat hypertension. In his editorial, Myers (pp. 707–709) underlines the arguments against initiating antihypertensive treatment and adding a ‘hypertension’ label to these individuals. On the other hand, Mancia (pp. 710–712) summarizes available evidence that white-coat hypertension is not a clinically innocent phenomenon to be disregarded when diagnosed and supports his arguments with the results of another article in this issue of the Journal, a meta-analysis of prospective studies showing that untreated white-coat hypertensive patients had a higher risk of cardiovascular events and total mortality than normotensive individuals, whereas in treated white-coat hypertension neither the risk of cardiovascular events nor mortality was increased (Huang et al., pp. 677–688). In absence of a specific randomized study, the dilemma about treating white-coat hypertension will remain unresolved. A number of aspects of antihypertensive treatment have been investigated in a set of other studies published in this issue. Shi et al. (pp. 696–706) have surveyed and meta-analyzed the BP effects of transcendental and nontranscendental meditation, reporting a small BP reduction with nontranscendental meditation. De Souza et al. (pp. 837–844) have observed a reduction in urinary aldosterone excretion in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea and resistant hypertension receiving continuous positive airway pressure treatment. J.-G. Wang et al. (pp. 877–885) present the results of a randomized study comparing treatment with sacubitril–valsartan as add-on therapy to amlodipine with amlodipine alone, finding significantly lower ambulatory BP values in the group receiving the combination. Commenting these data in an accompanying editorial, Burnier (pp. 726–728) underlines more studies with this interesting drug combination should be conducted in specific populations of hypertensive patients, such as elderly patients or patients with diabetes. From an analysis of data from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, Tedla et al. (pp. 862–869) report a lesser progression in arterial stiffness in treated hypertensive patients with controlled BP values, but slower progression occurred only in absence of diabetes and in individuals younger than 70 years. In an editorial commenting these data, Kollias et al. (pp. 721–725) remark that reduction of arterial stiffness progression is a difficult task, and to be successful intervention is needed ‘not too late and not too little’. By examining the National Acute Stroke Israeli registry, Koton et al. (pp. 870–876) report that patients under treatment with beta-blockers, either alone or in combination, at the time of an acute ischemic stroke had the same risk of stroke severity and poor outcomes as patients treated with other drug classes. A cost-effectiveness study from China suggests that the association of nitrendipine with hydrochlorothiazide allows more reasonable and efficient allocation of limited resources than the association of nitrendipine with metoprolol (Z. Wang et al., pp. 886–892). Ricci et al. (pp. 776–783) have examined data from the large Malmö Preventive Project, finding that hospital admissions due to syncope and orthostatic hypotension occur in about 3% of older individuals and increase with age and comorbidities. Syncope-related admissions predict higher all-cause mortality, whereas orthostatic hypotension-related admissions herald increased cardiovascular mortality. In a treated elderly hypertensive population in Australia, pet ownership was found associated with an improved cardiovascular disease survival (Chowdhury et al., pp. 769–775). In an accompanying commentary, Avolio et al. (pp. 718–720) enlarge the information to other medical conditions and ages, in which pet ownership appears to exert beneficial effects. Different aspects of the pathophysiology of hypertension and cardiovascular disease are approached by other articles. Bai et al. (pp. 784–797) report that shear stress-induced upregulation of the GTPCH/BH4 pathway ameliorates hypertension-related decline in the endothelial repair capacity of endothelial progenitor cells; Mao et al. (pp. 798–809) publish experimental evidence favoring a crucial role of acetylated cyclophylin A in the abnormal occurrence of autophagy and subsequent pulmonary vascular angiogenesis; Mo et al. (pp. 810–821) have investigated the potential effects of fat mass and obesity protein in modulating cholesterol deposition in macrophage foam cells and found that it exerts antiatherosclerotic properties in Apo E−/− mice; McMullan et al. (pp. 822–829) have performed a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation on the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) in humans, but found no effect of correcting vitamin D deficiency on RAS activity or BP; van Twist et al. (pp. 845–852) report that renal blood flow is significantly higher in fibromuscular dysplasia than in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis; and White et al. (pp. 761–768) have used ambulatory BP monitoring to show that the melanocortin receptor agonist, bremelanotide (developed to treat female sexual dysfunction), induces small, transient increases in BP, accompanied by reduction in heart rate. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hypertension→Same topicChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes→French-language works237,207→