Preparation and conduction of a production blast at an intersection in Kirov Mine, Apatit
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Apatit company mines apatite–nepheline ore using mainly the underground method which produces more than 70 % of the overall minerals extracted. In accord with the accepted mining technology, the operating horizons are developed from the center to the sides, with one or two cuts to get to another level. When two cuts are made on a horizon, in order to reach the required production output, two mining fronts are advanced toward each other, which results in formation of a block–pillar, and this intersection is cut at the end of the horizon development. After the analysis of the actual geotechnical, geological and geomechanical conditions, a production blast to break the intersection in Kirov Mine has been evaluated and prepared. Total volume broken by the blast is 726 thou t. Overall weight of explosive to break this intersection is 320 thou kg. Based on the geometry of the intersection and the number of blast hole rings, it has been decided to blast the holes from the sides toward the center of the intersection. As per the seismic safety standards, maximum weight of explosive per delay stage is evaluated, and blasting patterns and sequence are described. Considering particulars of the production blast in the intersection, the classical scheme of nonelectric blasting was used in combination with the electronic blast initiation system EBIS i-kon II manufactured by Orica CIS, which allowed blasting with seismically safe weight of explosive per delay stage. The production blast at the intersection used 1500 electronic detonators (total number of borehole charges was 2050). EBIS were installed in the blasthole rings, but their simultaneous blasting endangered the seismic safety. In blasting per rows with seismically unsafe weight of explosive per delay stage, the rings of holes were blasted uniformly, with a delay of 3–5 ms between the holes. The control and execution blocks had modem communication. Blasting was executed from the surface by means of telephone circuit. Orica CIS personnel controlled actuation of each delay stage using a special program. Seismic eff ect of the blast on buildings and structures was estimated using Instantel equipment (Canada) including 8-channel seismic measuring devices Minimate Plus. Actual PPV at all measurement points were below the maximum allowable values. The production blasting with the electronic initiation systems has yielded higher quality fragmentation of ore with the ensured seismic safety of the surface buildings and structures.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle