MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588808492 · doi:10.17580/gzh.2017.01.07

Preparation and conduction of a production blast at an intersection in Kirov Mine, Apatit

2017· article· en· W2588808492 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGornyi Zhurnal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersection (aeronautics)Production (economics)GeologyMining engineeringGeochemistryEnvironmental scienceEngineeringEconomicsTransport engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apatit company mines apatite–nepheline ore using mainly the underground method which produces more than 70 % of the overall minerals extracted. In accord with the accepted mining technology, the operating horizons are developed from the center to the sides, with one or two cuts to get to another level. When two cuts are made on a horizon, in order to reach the required production output, two mining fronts are advanced toward each other, which results in formation of a block–pillar, and this intersection is cut at the end of the horizon development. After the analysis of the actual geotechnical, geological and geomechanical conditions, a production blast to break the intersection in Kirov Mine has been evaluated and prepared. Total volume broken by the blast is 726 thou t. Overall weight of explosive to break this intersection is 320 thou kg. Based on the geometry of the intersection and the number of blast hole rings, it has been decided to blast the holes from the sides toward the center of the intersection. As per the seismic safety standards, maximum weight of explosive per delay stage is evaluated, and blasting patterns and sequence are described. Considering particulars of the production blast in the intersection, the classical scheme of nonelectric blasting was used in combination with the electronic blast initiation system EBIS i-kon II manufactured by Orica CIS, which allowed blasting with seismically safe weight of explosive per delay stage. The production blast at the intersection used 1500 electronic detonators (total number of borehole charges was 2050). EBIS were installed in the blasthole rings, but their simultaneous blasting endangered the seismic safety. In blasting per rows with seismically unsafe weight of explosive per delay stage, the rings of holes were blasted uniformly, with a delay of 3–5 ms between the holes. The control and execution blocks had modem communication. Blasting was executed from the surface by means of telephone circuit. Orica CIS personnel controlled actuation of each delay stage using a special program. Seismic eff ect of the blast on buildings and structures was estimated using Instantel equipment (Canada) including 8-channel seismic measuring devices Minimate Plus. Actual PPV at all measurement points were below the maximum allowable values. The production blasting with the electronic initiation systems has yielded higher quality fragmentation of ore with the ensured seismic safety of the surface buildings and structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it