MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2589078350 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.385.385

A Functional In Vivo RNAi screen Involving Jumonji C Domain Containing Candidates Unravels Kdm5b As a Negative Modulator of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Self-Renewal

2011· article· en· W2589078350 sur OpenAlexaff
Sonia Cellot, Kristin J. Hope, Martin Sauvageau, Jalila Chagraoui, Éric Deneault, Tara MacRae, Nadine Mayotte, Guy Sauvageau

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Établissements canadiensUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and CancerMcMaster UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyStem cellHaematopoiesisSmall hairpin RNAHematopoietic stem cellH3K4me3Molecular biologyCell biologyTransplantationRNA interferenceBone marrowCell cultureGene expressionGene knockdownGeneGeneticsImmunologyRNAPromoter

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 385 Epigenetic modifications influence chromatin accessibility, impacting on cell fate decisions, such as stem cell self-renewal and differentiation, in both normal and leukemic stem cells (LSC). To investigate the putative role of histone demethylases (HDM) in modulating primary hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) fate, an in vivo functional screen was performed, using an RNAi based strategy, involving 25 members of the Jumonji (JmjC) domain protein family. As a first step, expression profile studies of these gene candidates were undertaken. Transcripts of all these enzymes were detected in isolated HSC populations (frequency 1:2) from fetal liver (n=1) and bone marrow (n=2), except for Hairless. As compared to unsorted bone marrow (BM), stem cells harboured higher expression of Jarid1b (relative-fold enrichment (RQ) of 3.9±1.7), Jmjd2d (RQ3.8±1.9), and Jhdm1b (3.1±1.7). Next, 5shRNA were designed against each of the 25 JmjC containing proteins, and cloned into a retroviral LMP vector encoding GFP to permit tracking of transduced cells in vivo. HSC-enriched CD150+CD48−Lin−cells (∼60 LT-HSC) were infected over 5 days by co-culture with retroviral producer cells in an arrayed 96-well format, with one shRNA per well. Directly after infection, the in vivo reconstituting potential of ¼ of each well was evaluated through duplicate competitive repopulation assays involving the co-transplantation of 1.5 × 105 congenic BM competitor cells into irradiated recipients. The remaining cell fraction served to asses gene transfer by GFP epifluorescence measurements, and RNA isolated from sorted GFP+ cells was used to evaluate gene knockdown levels by Q-RT-PCR analysis. Blood reconstitution was evaluated at an early (4wks) and late time point (16–20wks), tracking the contribution of the donor CD45.1+ transduced (GFP+) cells to recipient hematopoiesis over time. As baseline references, sh-RNA to Luciferase (no effect) and the histone acetyl transferase Myst3 (stem cell loss) were used, as well as Hoxb4 over-expression (stem cell expansion). The primary screen, followed by validation experiments, unravelled one positive (Jhdm1f/Phf8) and two negative (Jarid1b, Hif1an) regulators of HSC activity. The strongest impact was seen with Jarid1b knockdown, and the resulting gain in HSC activity. As a confirmation step, cells were kept in culture for one week, to better contrast an increase in HSC activity, compared to control HSC. After 7 days in vitro, 1/8 equivalents of single well cultures were transplanted into 3 mice, and blood reconstitution levels serially assessed. Cells transduced with sh-RNA against Jarid1b contributed more significantly to host hematopoiesis than sh-RNA Luciferase transduced cells (58±16% vs 26±3% GFP), or Hoxb4 over-expressing cells (37±2% GFP), at comparable gene transfer rates, at the 16 week time point and beyond (3 independent experiments). Long-term HSC frequencies were evaluated from these cultures, and found to be 6–10 fold increased in shJari1d1b-cell cultures. In long-term recipients, differentiation potential of these cells was preserved, as evidenced by CD4+CD8+ thymic cells, B220+ splenic cells and CD11b+ bone marrow cells in the GFP positive contingent. Clonality studies on DNA isolated from these sorted populations confirmed oligoclonality of the stem cell expansion, and HSC pluripotency. There were no cases of leukemic transformation in all of the transplant recipients (n>30). As assessed by Q-RT-PCR, levels of HoxA5, HoxA9, HoxA10 and CxCl5 were increased in day7 sh3Jarib1b-cells (vs ctl), while the levels of the tumor suppressors Cav1, Sash1 and Egr1 were decreased. A more detailed assessment of the HoxA cluster revealed predominant expression of 5' cluster genes in expanding shJarib1b-cells, from HoxA5 to HoxA11, with a concomitant increase in the level of H3K4 tri-methylation, as assessed by ChIP-CHIP. In conclusion, HDM of the JmjC family can modulate HSC activity, both positively and negatively. These data suggest that the H3K4 demethylase Jarid1b (KDM5b) restrains stem cell self-renewal, acting as a co-repressor, possibly via epigenetic regulation of the HoxA gene cluster, among other target genes. This observation could be further exploited as an HSC expansion strategy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→Travaux en français237 207→