MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2589149922 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.1073.1073

A Phase I Study of IDH305 in Patients with Advanced Malignancies Including Relapsed/Refractory AML and MDS That Harbor IDH1R132 Mutations

2016· article· en· W2589149922 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Courtney D. DiNardo, Aaron D. Schimmer, Karen Yee, Andreas Hochhaus, Alwin Kraemer, Richard D. Carvajal, Filip Jankú, Philippe L. Bédard, Cecilia Carpio, Antje Wick, Gary K. Schwartz, Patrick Schöffski, Patrick Y. Wen, Martin J. van den Bent, Mark Rosenthal, Jessica O’Keeffe, Xueying Chen, Raymond Pagliarini, Virna Schuck, Andrea P. Myers, Andrew H. Wei

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIsocitrate dehydrogenaseIDH1TolerabilityMedicinePopulationMyeloid leukemiaGliomaMyelodysplastic syndromesPharmacologyCancer researchInternal medicineOncologyAdverse effectBiologyMutationEnzymeGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) enzymes catalyze the NADP-dependent interconversion of isocitrate and α-ketoglutarate. R132* IDH1 mutations lead to cellular accumulation of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), an oncometabolite that promotes tumorigenesis. IDH1 mutations are found in glioma (~80%), chondrosarcoma (~50%), cholangiocarcinoma (~20% intrahepatic), acute myeloid leukemia (AML; ~6-9%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; ~3%). IDH305 is a potent, orally available, mutant-selective, allosteric IDH1 inhibitor. IDH305 suppresses mutant IDH1-dependent 2-HG production and cell proliferation with an IC50 of 24 nM, and has antitumor activity in preclinical studies. Methods: The objectives of this ongoing phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced cancers are to evaluate the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics, and preliminary antitumor activity of IDH305 (IDH305X2101, NCT02381886). This trial is specifically designed to evaluate the safety of IDH305 both across and within 3 broad disease areas: glioma, AML/MDS, and other/non-CNS solid tumors with the IDH1R132 mutation. IDH305 is orally administered twice a day (BID) in continuous 21-day cycles. The starting dose of 75 mg BID was determined from 4-week toxicology studies following ICH Guideline S9. Dose escalation is guided by a Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM), which evaluates the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) relationship to the collective population, as well as to specific disease areas, across dose levels, to model the similarity in the rate of DLTs during the first cycle of treatment. The BHM permits the declaration of different maximum tolerated doses (MTDs)/recommended doses for expansion (RDEs) for 3 disease areas, if suggested by the data. Dose expansions in disease-specific cohorts are designed to further characterize safety and explore antitumor activity. Pre- and on-treatment specimens (blood, tumor) are being collected for PK and PD evaluations. Results: As of the data cut-off, March 30, 2016, 81 patients have been enrolled: glioma (n=32), AML (n=21), MDS (n=3), other/non-CNS solid tumors (n=24), and unknown (n=1). Patients were treated with IDH305 on a BID schedule at various doses: 75 mg (n=6), 150 mg (n=11), 300 mg (n=16), 450 mg (n=9), 550 mg (n=16), 750 mg (n=10), and 900 mg (n=13). During dose escalation, DLTs of Grade 3 elevated bilirubin were observed in 2 patients with solid tumors (2 at 550 mg BID), 1 patient with glioma (900 mg BID) who also experienced a DLT of Grade 3 elevated lipase, and 1 patient with AML (750 mg BID). A DLT of Grade 3 rash was observed in 1 patient with a solid tumor (750 mg BID). All DLTs resolved and were considered reversible. MTDs for each disease area were not determined. RDE was determined for glioma (550 mg BID) and solid tumors (550 mg BID). Dose escalation continues for AML/MDS. Across all 3 disease areas, the most common adverse events (AE) reported as suspected of being related to IDH305 (>10%, all grades) included: bilirubin increased (30.9%); aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased (17.3%); alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased (16.0%); and nausea (13.6%). Grade 3 AEs suspected to be related to IDH305 that occurred in >1 patient included: bilirubin increased (8.6%)/hyperbilirubinemia (2.5%); AST increased (2.5%); and ALT increased (3.7%). Among 24 AML/MDS patients (21 relapsed/refractory AML and 3 MDS), the most common suspected AEs reported as being related to IDH305 (>5%, all grades) included: raised bilirubin and lipase (8.3% each). There was one Grade 3 AE of increased bilirubin that was also a DLT. Objective responses were reported in 7 (33%) AML patients: complete remission in 2 (9.5%), complete remission with incomplete recovery in 1 (4.8%), and partial remission in 4 (19.0%) patients. Responses appear durable. PK, PD, and updated clinical safety and efficacy data will be reported. Conclusion: Preliminary clinical data suggest that IDH305 has a favorable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in IDH1-mutated AML. Studies to further evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of IDH305 as a single agent and in combination are ongoing. Disclosures DiNardo: Agios: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Schimmer:Novartis: Honoraria. Yee:Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hochhaus:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Carvajal:Novartis: Consultancy. Janku:Agios: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bedard:Novartis: Research Funding. van den Bent:Novartis, Roche, AbbVie, Celgene, BMS: Consultancy. O'Keeffe:Novartis: Employment. Chen:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Pagliarini:Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Schuck:Novartis: Employment. Myers:Novartis Institutes of Biomedical Research: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wei:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations59
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207