MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2591962416 · doi:10.1158/1557-3265.pdx16-a10

Abstract A10: Plerixafor inhibits myeloid cell recruitment and improves the radioresponse in patient-derived cervix cancer xenograft models

2016· article· en· W2591962416 sur OpenAlexaff
Naz Chaudary, Melania Pintilie, Rićhard P. Hill, Michael Milosevic

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical Cancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCervical cancerCervixCancerRadiation therapyPlerixaforOncologyPathologyCancer researchCXCR4Internal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Standard treatment for women who are diagnosed with stage IIB through IVA cervical cancer consists of radiation and cisplatin-based chemotherapy (RTCT) with a control rate of approximately 60% depending on stage. Current options for patients with recurrent and metastatic disease are limited, and their median overall survival from recurrence is <12 months. To date, biologic therapy has had little impact on survival, so identification of potential new targets is urgently required to develop novel therapeutic strategies. Equally developing relevant animal models is important to further enhance our understanding of the characteristics of human cervix cancers and for assessment of novel therapies. We have established a panel of orthotopically-passaged xenografts (OCICx) by implanting cervix tumor pieces from patient biopsies directly into the cervices of mice. These tumors grow and metastasize to the para-aortic lymphnodes in a manner similar to that in patients. These models have been shown to mirror the clinical and biological behavior of cervical cancer in patients in regards to the tumor microenvironmental parameters including epithelial and stromal content, vascularity, proliferation, lymphatics, hypoxia and interstitial fluid pressure. Purpose: Cervical cancers recruit myeloid cells from the bone marrow via the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway, which in turn influences vascular function and radiotherapy response. The objective of our study was to explore combined treatment with Plerixafor (a CXCL12/CXCR4 inhibitor) and standard RTCT on primary tumor response and the development of metastases, using orthotopic xenografts derived directly from patients with cervical cancer. Methods: Two primary cervix (OCICx13 and OCICx20) and ME180 (human cervix cancer; cell line derived) xenografts were grown in the cervices of immune deficient mice. To simulate clinical treatment, image-guided radiotherapy (30 Gy in 15 daily fractions) and concurrent weekly cisplatin (4 mg/kg) were administered, with or without Plerixafor (5 mg/kg/day). Plerixafor treatments were administered either concurrently with RTCT or immediately subsequent to RTCT (for 3 weeks post RTCT).The primary endpoints were tumor growth delay and the frequency of lymph node metastases. Chemokine expression and neutrophil recruitment were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Acute gut toxicity was assessed using the crypt cell assay. Blood and normal organs were examined for late toxicity. Results: The combination of RTCT and Plerixafor (administered either concurrently with or subsequent to RTCT) produced enhanced tumor growth delay and reduced metastases compared to standard RTCT alone in both the ME180 and the patient-derived xenograft models. There was a reduction in chemokine signaling (CXCL12/CXCR4) and myeloid cell infiltration (GCSF, CD11b) with combination treatment compared to RTCT alone. There was no effect of Plerixafor on acute GI toxicity, nor were there changes in blood counts or organ morphology to indicate increased late hematological or normal tissue toxicity. Late gut toxicity studies are underway. There was no difference between concurrent and subsequent treatment with Plerixafor in tumor growth delay and metastasis. Further studies examining the genetic characterization of the OCICx models and the associated patient cervix biopsies are underway. Conclusion: The OCICx orthotopic xenografts represent unique models to test strategies for targeting essential pathways in cervix cancer and metastasis. This preclinical study demonstrates that the addition of Plerixafor to standard RTCT for cervical cancer improves local tumor response and reduced metastases with no increase in toxicity. Plerixafor is commercially available for other indications, which will facilitate translation of these findings to phase I/II clinical studies. Citation Format: Naz Chaudary, Melania Pintilie, Richard Hill, Michael Milosevic. Plerixafor inhibits myeloid cell recruitment and improves the radioresponse in patient-derived cervix cancer xenograft models. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Patient-Derived Cancer Models: Present and Future Applications from Basic Science to the Clinic; Feb 11-14, 2016; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(16_Suppl):Abstract nr A10.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,199
Tête enseignante GPT0,415
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueClinical Cancer ResearchMême sujetNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsTravaux en français237 207