MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591962416 · doi:10.1158/1557-3265.pdx16-a10

Abstract A10: Plerixafor inhibits myeloid cell recruitment and improves the radioresponse in patient-derived cervix cancer xenograft models

2016· article· en· W2591962416 on OpenAlexaff
Naz Chaudary, Melania Pintilie, Rićhard P. Hill, Michael Milosevic

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCervical cancerCervixCancerRadiation therapyPlerixaforOncologyPathologyCancer researchCXCR4Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Standard treatment for women who are diagnosed with stage IIB through IVA cervical cancer consists of radiation and cisplatin-based chemotherapy (RTCT) with a control rate of approximately 60% depending on stage. Current options for patients with recurrent and metastatic disease are limited, and their median overall survival from recurrence is <12 months. To date, biologic therapy has had little impact on survival, so identification of potential new targets is urgently required to develop novel therapeutic strategies. Equally developing relevant animal models is important to further enhance our understanding of the characteristics of human cervix cancers and for assessment of novel therapies. We have established a panel of orthotopically-passaged xenografts (OCICx) by implanting cervix tumor pieces from patient biopsies directly into the cervices of mice. These tumors grow and metastasize to the para-aortic lymphnodes in a manner similar to that in patients. These models have been shown to mirror the clinical and biological behavior of cervical cancer in patients in regards to the tumor microenvironmental parameters including epithelial and stromal content, vascularity, proliferation, lymphatics, hypoxia and interstitial fluid pressure. Purpose: Cervical cancers recruit myeloid cells from the bone marrow via the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway, which in turn influences vascular function and radiotherapy response. The objective of our study was to explore combined treatment with Plerixafor (a CXCL12/CXCR4 inhibitor) and standard RTCT on primary tumor response and the development of metastases, using orthotopic xenografts derived directly from patients with cervical cancer. Methods: Two primary cervix (OCICx13 and OCICx20) and ME180 (human cervix cancer; cell line derived) xenografts were grown in the cervices of immune deficient mice. To simulate clinical treatment, image-guided radiotherapy (30 Gy in 15 daily fractions) and concurrent weekly cisplatin (4 mg/kg) were administered, with or without Plerixafor (5 mg/kg/day). Plerixafor treatments were administered either concurrently with RTCT or immediately subsequent to RTCT (for 3 weeks post RTCT).The primary endpoints were tumor growth delay and the frequency of lymph node metastases. Chemokine expression and neutrophil recruitment were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Acute gut toxicity was assessed using the crypt cell assay. Blood and normal organs were examined for late toxicity. Results: The combination of RTCT and Plerixafor (administered either concurrently with or subsequent to RTCT) produced enhanced tumor growth delay and reduced metastases compared to standard RTCT alone in both the ME180 and the patient-derived xenograft models. There was a reduction in chemokine signaling (CXCL12/CXCR4) and myeloid cell infiltration (GCSF, CD11b) with combination treatment compared to RTCT alone. There was no effect of Plerixafor on acute GI toxicity, nor were there changes in blood counts or organ morphology to indicate increased late hematological or normal tissue toxicity. Late gut toxicity studies are underway. There was no difference between concurrent and subsequent treatment with Plerixafor in tumor growth delay and metastasis. Further studies examining the genetic characterization of the OCICx models and the associated patient cervix biopsies are underway. Conclusion: The OCICx orthotopic xenografts represent unique models to test strategies for targeting essential pathways in cervix cancer and metastasis. This preclinical study demonstrates that the addition of Plerixafor to standard RTCT for cervical cancer improves local tumor response and reduced metastases with no increase in toxicity. Plerixafor is commercially available for other indications, which will facilitate translation of these findings to phase I/II clinical studies. Citation Format: Naz Chaudary, Melania Pintilie, Richard Hill, Michael Milosevic. Plerixafor inhibits myeloid cell recruitment and improves the radioresponse in patient-derived cervix cancer xenograft models. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Patient-Derived Cancer Models: Present and Future Applications from Basic Science to the Clinic; Feb 11-14, 2016; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(16_Suppl):Abstract nr A10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsFrench-language works237,207