Ukrainian Otherlands: Diaspora, Homeland, and Folk Imagination in the Twentieth Century by Natalia Khanenko-Friesen (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ukrainian Otherlands: Diaspora, Homeland, and Folk Imagination in the Twentieth Century. By Natalia Khanenko-Friesen. (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2015. Pp. ix + 263, notes, index, 31 black-and-white photographs.)Natalia Khanenko-Friesen's Ukrainian Otherlands presents an overview of the diasporic in the folk imagination among Ukrainian nationals and ukrainian Canadians. While the work's title implies that the author will consider the entire century, the book focuses on the short twentieth century from the end of World War I to the collapse of the USSR in 1991 (p. 18). The book consists of seven chapters plus an introduction and an epilogue. Each chapter is dedicated to a particular phenomenon associated with the view of the other Ukrainians, for example, those in the diaspora or in the motherland. Khanenko-Friesen alternates between a consideration of the views of Ukrainians in western Ukraine (chapters 2, 4) and Ukrainian Canadians, primarily in the Canadian prairies (chapters 1, 3, 5), from the 1920s to the 1990s. Chapter 6 addresses both sides of this divide, with a slight emphasis on the Ukrainian Canadian point of view, while chapter 7 turns to the diaspora in Southern Europe, primarily in Italy and Portugal after the collapse of the Soviet Union.Each chapter is dedicated to a particular vernacular phenomenon that emerged from the separation between Ukrainian immigrants and those who stayed behind. Khanenko-Friesen's goal is to illustrate how the folkloric imagination and a variety of vernacular narrative resources served to maintain ties, cope with the crisis resulting from leaving one's home and kin, and foster the folk imagination of the Ukrainian others in distant lands. Chapter 1 deals with the songs produced by early immigrants to Canada in the post-World War I years. She contextualizes these songs within the tradition of songs of separation in Ukrainian culture for weddings, funerals, and the departures of soldiers and seasonal laborers from their home villages. Khanenko-Friesen presents an analysis of the songs using the Proppian system designed for magic tales (and similar analyses occur in chapters 4 and 5 in regard to letters and family histories) that many will find to be untenable. It detracts from her argument that the songs of separation, many of which were sent back to Ukraine and became popular there, served to internalize the of a split . . . in the lives of many individuals and many communities in western Ukraine (p. 31).Chapter 2 turns to the mediation of the absence of kin and coping with the split in the homeland in the early years, when ongoing connections, return, and communication among immigrants and those left behind were still possible and commonplace. While the Ukrainian social networks may have been defined by the split, they worked around the rupture to create a coherent community. Khanenko-Friesen focuses on the rituals that kept kin connected and served to foster a sense of community. The sense of one's own people vs. outsiders, even if physically absent, was highlighted in daily life in the villages she studied. Thus while loved ones were absent, they maintained a ritual presence in one's daily life, and lore (both narrative and rite) served to resolve the ambiguity (p. 54). In particular, the author focuses on new rituals of departure patterned after traditional funeral rites that arose in this period. In my view, one could make a case that these rites of departure could also have been based on the wedding cycle, in which the bride was mourned as she left her family, never to return. While there may be evidence that the funeral is more appropriate, I wish that the author had provided a clearer explanation of this argument.Chapters 3-5 focus on the period after World War II, when this part of Ukraine became part of the USSR, through the 1980s. The political annexation of western Ukraine fundamentally changed the vernacular resources that both immigrants and Ukrainian nationals could rely on to maintain ties. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».