Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) Patient Plasmas Consistently Activate Complement: A Novel Approach to Detecting a Pathogenic Mechanism for APS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract INTRODUCTION: The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has remained an enigmatic condition for over 3 decades. Pathogenic mechanism(s) have not been established, and the disorder has therefore continued to be defined by non-mechanistic assays such as the lupus anticoagulant and antiphospholipid immunoassays. Although evidence from animal models has indicated a role for complement activation in the disease process, it is has been remarkable that activation markers are not consistently detected in human APS plasmas. We hypothesized that this might be due to rapid clearance of activation products and that we might be better able to detect a role for complement in APS through a 2 stage system - i.e. by first allowing APS immune complexes to form on phospholipid vesicles and then measuring whether those vesicles might activate complement in normal serum. METHODS : Complement activation markers - specifically C5a and the C5b-9 membrane attack complex - were measured in plasmas of 5 groups of plasmas (n= 10 for each group): normal healthy controls, APS with clinical histories for thrombosis (8 with venous thromboembolism (VTE), 1 venous stroke, and 1 arterial stroke), cancer patients without thrombosis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) without APS, and VTE without APS. These were compared to measurements of complement activation induced by phospholipid vesicles that were pre-incubated with the same plasmas. Additional experiments were then done to: 1) characterize whether the effects could be reproduced with purified APS vs control IgGs and β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI), 2) define the complement activation pathways involved with factor B and C2 deficient sera and with serum in the presence of EGTA and MgCl2, and 3) determine whether the activation could be inhibited by the monoclonal anti-C5 antibody, eculizimab. RESULTS: When the plasmas themselves were assayed, we found no significant differences in the plasmas levels of C5a or C5b-9 between APS and controls or among the 5 groups (Fig 1 A, B). In contrast, preincubation of phospholipid vesicles with plasmas resulted in significant elevations of both C5a (Fig 1C) and C5b-9 (Fig 1D) in APS compared to controls. Also, C5a levels in cancer, SLE and VTE were significantly lower than in APS, but above the controls. C5b-9 levels were elevated in APS and the other disease groups compared to controls, with the APS levels that were significantly higher than only the cancer group. The results were confirmed using purified IgGs and β2GPI in place of the whole plasmas. In addition, we found that APS-treated vesicles triggered complement activation via both the classical/lectin pathway and the alternative pathway. Eculizimab completely abrogated the complement activation. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that APS patient plasmas clearly and consistently activate complement. This was achieved through the novel approach of first incubating the plasmas with phospholipid vesicles which serve as platforms for the assembly of APS plasma-derived protein complexes that, in turn, activate complement. In addition, these findings may provide the basis for a mechanistic biomarker for disease activity in APS, by detecting complement activation at the site of injury. * P<0.05 vs Controls. # P<0.05 vs APS Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».