MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2600737182 · doi:10.1182/blood.v120.21.137.137

Continuous Dose Dasatinib Is Safe and Feasible in Combination with Intensive Chemotherapy in Pediatric Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL): Children's Oncology Group (COG) Trial AALL0622

2012· article· en· W2600737182 sur OpenAlexaff
William B. Slayton, Kirk R. Schultz, Tamekia L. Jones, Elizabeth A. Raetz, Meenakshi Devidas, Michael A. Pulsipher, Mignon L. Loh, Bill H. Chang, William L. Carroll, Michael J. Borowitz, Lewis B. Silverman, Valerie I. Brown, Naomi Winick, Andrew J. Carroll, Nyla A. Heerema, Julie M. Gastier‐Foster, Brent L. Wood, Sherri L. Mizrahy, Thomas E. Merchant, Stephen P. Hunger

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Établissements canadiensBC Children's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDasatinibMedicineCohortInternal medicineImatinibAcute lymphocytic leukemiaChemotherapyOncologyClinical endpointSurgeryClinical trialLeukemiaLymphoblastic LeukemiaMyeloid leukemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 137 COG AALL0031 generated an outstanding 80% 3 yr event free survival for children with Ph+ ALL treated with imatinib plus intensive chemotherapy. We hypothesized that the 2nd generation BCR-ABL1/SRC kinase inhibitor dasatinib would improve Ph+ ALL outcomes compared to imatinib due to increased potency, better CNS penetration, and activity against many imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL1 point mutations. AALL0622 tested the safety and feasibility of adding dasatinib to AALL0031 chemotherapy in newly diagnosed children and young adults (1–30 years) with Ph+ ALL. Safety and feasibility were defined as >5 out of 6 patients (pts) completing 23 weeks of treatment through Intensification Block 1 without having a protocol-defined dose limiting toxicity (DLT). In Cohort 1, dasatinib (60 mg/m2 once/day) was given discontinuously (the 1st 2 weeks of every 3–4 week block) starting on Induction day 15. Enrollment in Cohort 1 continued until 6 evaluable pts completed Intensification 1 (23 weeks of therapy) and were assessed for toxicity. Two of the first 6 pts experienced DLTs (treatment delays) following the 2nd high dose methotrexate (HD MTX) given on day 15 of Intensification 1. Amendment 2 removed day 15 HD MTX in Intensification 1 and 2. After this, discontinuous dasatinib (60 mg/m2) was found to be safe and feasible, and pts were then enrolled on Cohort 2 to test continuous dasatinib. The first 6 evaluable Cohort 2 pts who completed therapy through Intensification 1 with continuous dasatinib (60 mg/m2) had no significant treatment delays, but one pt experienced a DLT (grade 4 sensory neuropathy) during Consolidation 1. No induction deaths occurred in either cohort. The safety phase, completed in 10/2011, established the safety and feasibility of continuous dasatinib (60 mg/m2) integrated with the intensive phases of the modified AALL0031 backbone. After the Cohort 1 safety phase was completed, a patient developed leukoencephalopathy, transient speech impairment, motor weakness and gait disturbance after receiving HD MTX during Intensification 2. The gait and motor impairment persisted suggesting that it could be attributed to an interaction between dasatinib and HD MTX. Subsequently, no Cohort 2 pts experienced leukoencephalopathy in 70 treatment blocks containing HD MTX. Transient neurotoxicity (including ≥ grade 2 seizure, encephalopathy, cognitive disturbance, or altered level of consciousness) was seen in 8/34 (24%) Cohort 1 pts, who completed Consolidation 1 prior to Amendment 5, after receiving ifosfamide, etoposide, and triple intrathecal therapy (ITT). Because of the temporal relationship with ifosfamide and ITT, and the intensified CNS prophylaxis on AAL0622 relative to AALL0031 at the beginning of Consolidation 1, these events were attributed to the chemotherapy backbone and not dasatinib. After Amendment 5 which omitted day 1 Consolidation ITT and substituted IT MTX for ITT on Induction day 29, only 4% (1/25 pts including 4 remaining Cohort 1 and 21 Cohort 2 pts), experienced neurotoxicity (grade 2 seizure). Non-hematological Grade 4 toxicities included a Cohort 1 pt who developed Grade 4 prolonged QTc interval with adenovirus associated diarrhea, hypokalemia and hypophosphatemia during Maintenance 2. Dasatinib was held and prolonged QTc resolved. Another Cohort 1 pt developed grade 4 jaundice during Maintenance 6 that also resolved after holding 6-MP, MTX and dasatinib. Both of these pts continued therapy without recurrent toxicity. Twelve Cohort 1 pts have completed 2 1/2 years of protocol therapy and tolerated discontinuous dose dasatinib well during Maintenance. No pts have had effusions, heart failure, or pulmonary hypertension. AALL0622 enrolled 60 eligible pts (39 on Cohort 1; 21 on Cohort 2). Importantly, we recently reported that early introduction of TKI on day 15 of induction and substitution of dasatinib for imatinib on AALL0622 led to improved induction remission rates from 89% to 98% compared to all Ph+ pts on AALL0031, end induction negative minimal residual disease (MRD) rates (<0.01% by flow) from 25% to 59%, and end Consolidation 2 negative MRD rates from 71% to 89% when comparing AALL0031 Cohorts 3–5 to AALL0622 Cohorts 1 and 2. Based on the promising early response and safety data and concerns about long-term toxicity of the AALL0031 backbone, a joint COG/EsPhALL trial is underway testing the efficacy and safety of continuous dasatinib (60mg/m2) on a less intensive EsPhALL backbone. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Dasatinib is indicated for newly diagnosed adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase. The effectiveness of SPRYCEL in these patients is based on a study that measured two types of response to treatment (cytogenetic and molecular) by 1 year. The study is ongoing to find out how dasatinib works over a longer period of time Dasatinib is also indicated for Ph+ CML patients who are no longer benefitting from, or did not tolerate, other treatment including Gleevec® (imatinib mesylate). Loh:Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hunger:Bristol Meyer Squibb: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations9
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207