Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Welcome back to our readers. Over the past year, the staff and Board of Directors of the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) have been immersed in the mysterious inner workings of the publishing world. At the Paediatrics & Child Health vicennial (the official word for a 20-year anniversary), the CPS purchased the journal from our former publisher. You are reading our first issue as an Oxford University Press (OUP) journal. Since OUP published the first translation of the Bible to English (the King James Version), we have great confidence that this will be a long-term arrangement. Due to the foresight of Dr. Noni MacDonald, our founding editor, we have been able to retain our title and our respectable impact factor of 1.574; this at a time when many other Canadian subspecialty journals have recently lost both of these critical components. What do we aim to publish? Our goal is to feature manuscripts that update readers on the practical aspects of diagnosis or treatment of diseases in children and youth, demonstrate to them how to be formidable communicators and teachers or inspire them to work toward improving the lot of children. In addition to publishing CPS position statements and practice points and high-quality original research, we are looking for submissions for the following columns: The Critical Lens (Dr. Guido Filler, editor): Concise commentaries on topics that are relevant for child health. Paediatric Progress: How Should It Change Your Practice? (Dr. Eyal Cohen, editor): Summaries of recent developments that have practical implications for clinicians. A Picture Says a Thousand Words (Dr. Alexander Leung, editor): Images that pose a diagnostic dilemma or are dramatic illustrations of a condition. See Many, Do Many, and Teach Many (Dr. Mark Awuku, editor): Reports of medical education interventions with outcome data. The Path to High Quality Care (Dr. Guido Filler, editor): Quality improvement initiatives with outcome data or novel solutions to patient safety issues. The View From the Top (editor pending): Overviews or compilations of systematic reviews on different interventions for the same condition. Practical Tips for Paediatricians (editor pending): Practical strategies for diagnosis or management that are not published elsewhere. The Road Less Travelled – Rapid Reviews in Integrative Medicine (editor pending): High-quality systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine. To tell you a bit about myself, I am a paediatric infectious diseases physician at the Stollery Children’s Hospital in Edmonton and am proud of the fact that I completed my paediatric residency at British Columbia Children’s Hospital. My husband tells me that I constantly give people advice whether they want it or not, so feel free to contact me if you have questions for me or think that I too would benefit from unsolicited advice! I am very much looking forward to working with OUP and CPS in advocating for Canadian children and youth and educating child and youth health professionals across the country. To all of our readers, authors and peer reviewers, thank you for joining us as we begin the next 20 years of Paediatrics & Child Health.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,016 | 0,052 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,018 | 0,013 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,038 | 0,042 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,017 | 0,010 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».